T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
3905.1 | HELP"::ABBYRD$DKA100:[KANSAS.KITS.VAX.OBSOLETE] | YAKKA::KINGSMILL | Geoff Kingsmill, Australia | Fri Mar 21 1997 19:02 | 8 |
| Veli,
The old kits are in the following location:-
HELP""::ABBYRD$DKA100:[KANSAS.KITS.VAX.OBSOLETE]
HELP""::ABBYRD$DKA100:[KANSAS.KITS.AXP.OBSOLETE]
Geoff..
|
3905.2 | first bank done | VELI::KORKKO | Veli K�rkk� @FNO, 879-5512 | Mon Mar 24 1997 01:48 | 5 |
| Thanks. I managed to copy over ECO 5 and the upgrade of customer SWIFT system
from OpenVMS V5.5-2, DECnet/Phase IV, P.S.I V4.3 to OpenVMS V6.2, DECnet/OSI
V6.3-5 etc went just fine.
_veli
|
3905.3 | V6.3 ECO5 is missing tower maintenance | BULEAN::TAYLOR | | Mon Mar 24 1997 15:45 | 17 |
|
Please have a look at the V6.3 ECO6 release notes
and compare them with V6.3 ECO5. You don't have
Session Control Tower Maintenance with V6.3 ECO5
for one thing. There's both an NSP and an
OSI Transport crash that we saw quite regularly.
This is why ECO5 kit never got into TIMA. The
fact that this kit did not survive long enough
without additional fixed images, is the reason
that this kit is not found in TIMA.
I think that the request should be for ECO5 or
later.
Cheers,
Pat
|
3905.4 | | VELI::KORKKO | Veli K�rkk� @FNO, 879-5512 | Tue Mar 25 1997 14:17 | 8 |
| They (SWIFT) appear to specify ECO #5. I'll check with the
customer once again but I have had two major banks already to
check out this from SWIFT and from both of them I have received
"it has to be ECO #5".
Well, I'll check it once more.
_veli
|