T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
695.1 | I-nodes & hw links | NNTPD::"[email protected] " | Michael R. Balomiri | Wed May 21 1997 04:20 | 5 |
| do you have:
1) Clones as SS
2) HW Links
[Posted by WWW Notes gateway]
|
695.2 | | KNEIPE::NOFFKE | | Wed May 21 1997 05:25 | 3 |
| 1) no clones as SS
2) what is the point with the HW links?
|
695.3 | you sure NSR is doing a incr?? | DECWET::EVANS | NSR Engineering | Wed May 21 1997 12:39 | 5 |
| it could be doing a full... post
savegroup -pnv -c client-name group-name-containing-client
verbatim so we can see too.
|
695.4 | Output of "savegroup -pnv -c hessen.frs.dec.com systeme" | KNEIPE::NOFFKE | | Wed May 21 1997 23:22 | 37 |
|
hessen.frs.dec.com:/ level=7
hessen.frs.dec.com:/usr level=7
hessen.frs.dec.com:/var level=7
5/22/97 7:13:28 savegroup: Run up to 4 clients in parallel
5/22/97 7:13:28 savegroup: hessen.frs.dec.com:probe started
savefs -s tbla2.frs.dec.com -g systeme -p -n -l full -R -v -F / /usr /var
5/22/97 7:13:34 savegroup: hessen.frs.dec.com:probe succeeded.
rcmd hessen.frs.dec.com, user root: `savefs -s tbla2.frs.dec.com -g systeme -p
-n -l full -R -v -F / /usr /var'
asavegrp: authtype nsrexec
type: NSR client description;
pools supported: Yes;
arch: decaxp;
CPU type: alpha;
CPUs: 1;
hosts: 1;
IP address: 16.185.224.20;
kernel arch: OSF1;
License units: 1050;
NAS Client: No;
OS: OSF1 V4.0;
version: V4.2A;
save set: path=/, arg=/, level=full, diskno=2, max_sessions=1, stype=save,\
path=/usr, arg=/usr, level=full, diskno=1, max_sessions=1, stype=save,\
path=/var, arg=/var, level=full, diskno=0, max_sessions=1, stype=save ;
parallelism: 8
--- Probe Summary ---
hessen.frs.dec.com:/ level=7, dn=2, mx=1, vers=pools, p=8
hessen.frs.dec.com:/ level=7, save as of Mon Mar 17 22:12:08 GMT+0100 1997
hessen.frs.dec.com:/usr level=7, dn=1, mx=1, vers=pools, p=8
hessen.frs.dec.com:/usr level=7, save as of Mon Mar 17 22:06:16 GMT+0100 1997
hessen.frs.dec.com:/var level=7, dn=0, mx=1, vers=pools, p=8
hessen.frs.dec.com:/var level=7, save as of Mon Mar 17 22:10:54 GMT+0100 1997
hessen.frs.dec.com:index level=7, dn=-1, mx=0, vers=pools, p=8
hessen.frs.dec.com:index level=7, save as of Thu May 1 22:47:57 GMT+0200 1997
|
695.5 | Index instances for the /usr filesystem | KNEIPE::NOFFKE | | Wed May 21 1997 23:27 | 28 |
| 11860 22053 637 MB 3/17/97 full
11897 19234 314 MB 3/18/97 incr
11943 19136 313 MB 3/19/97 incr
11983 19198 313 MB 3/20/97 incr
12137 19621 316 MB 3/24/97 incr
12180 19336 318 MB 3/25/97 incr
12219 19341 314 MB 3/26/97 incr
12371 19578 329 MB 4/11/97 incr
12511 19400 317 MB 4/14/97 incr
12560 19995 352 MB 4/15/97 7
12604 19511 317 MB 4/16/97 incr
12648 19957 370 MB 4/17/97 incr
12819 20062 322 MB 4/22/97 incr
12862 20247 410 MB 4/22/97 7
12909 19681 320 MB 4/23/97 incr
12952 19249 314 MB 4/24/97 incr
13038 19229 315 MB 4/28/97 incr
13070 19202 314 MB 4/28/97 incr
13113 19908 411 MB 4/29/97 7
13361 19631 374 MB 5/05/97 incr
13401 19086 307 MB 5/06/97 incr
13446 19485 309 MB 5/07/97 incr
13490 20537 471 MB 5/08/97 7
13537 19204 307 MB 5/13/97 incr
13582 19256 308 MB 5/14/97 incr
13627 20493 473 MB 5/15/97 7
13841 19342 313 MB 5/20/97 incr
13882 19509 308 MB 5/21/97 incr
|
695.6 | See what's being backed up | DECWET::GRAHAM | | Thu May 22 1997 10:00 | 22 |
| You need to see what is being backed up in an incremental
on this client. Maybe you have a large file which is touched
daily.
There's a NetWorker command called nsrinfo which allows you
to see what is in a client's online index for a particular
save, among other things. Here's how to do it (from the nsrinfo
man page example, tried on my workstation):
root@cochiti[20]> mminfo -r nsavetime -v -N / -c cochiti -ot |tail -1
864314936
root@cochiti[21]> nsrinfo -t 864314936 cochiti.zso.dec.com
Result is a list of all files backed up for that save. My example
looks at the last save; you will want to make sure you specify one
of the large incremetals you're interested in, as well as the
appropriate filesystem in the mminfo command.
When I tried it, the fully qualified client name was required
by nsrinfo.
Debbie
|
695.7 | | NNTPD::"[email protected]" | Uwe Noffke | Tue May 27 1997 01:15 | 17 |
| Debby,
today I did two incremental backups on my workstation by manually starting
them
from nwadmin's "customize/Groups..." dialogbox. The first incremental totalled
to 18178 files and 267MB, the second had 17473 files and 266MB. Then I
generated
a list of the saveset contents using the commands you proposed.
Result: the 17473 files from the second saveset had been backed up twice
within
half an hour.
How does Networker determine what files to include into an incremental
backup??
Uwe
[Posted by WWW Notes gateway]
|
695.8 | man save has details | DECWET::EVANS | NSR Engineering | Tue May 27 1997 10:13 | 12 |
| save -l incr saves all files changed (mtime) since last save. if mtime gets
changed for *any* reason, files are saved by NSR.
save -l <number> saves files that have mtime changed since last level "x"
save.
schedule determines the level for a savegroup - check your schedule.
regardless of what level is specified, if NetWorker determines there are no
entries in the index, it does a full backup. This can occur anytime should
the name of the index not match *precisely* the name of the client being
saved (for one example).
|
695.9 | Any directives in force for the files | DECWET::GRAHAM | | Tue May 27 1997 15:03 | 9 |
| Uwe,
If the files did not have their mtime values changed between the
two incrementals you ran, maybe you have a directive in effect for
them. The "always" directive causes a file or directory to be backed
up regardless of its last change time. Look at the nsr_directive and
uasm man pages for more information.
Debbie
|
695.10 | No directives | NNTPD::"[email protected]" | Uwe Noffke | Wed May 28 1997 05:10 | 29 |
| Debbie,
I didn't find any nsr directives in effect. Also, when I looked for modified
files using
find /usr -mtime -2
I found about 1000 files that had been changed since Monday. Doing a
savegrp -n -C Quarterly Test
or
savegrp -n -l inc Test
showed the following output:
hessen.frs.dec.com:/ 685 records 127 KB header 13 MB data
hessen.frs.dec.com:/ 13 MB estimated
hessen.frs.dec.com:/var 323 records 62 KB header 5.0 MB data
hessen.frs.dec.com:/var 5.1 MB estimated
hessen.frs.dec.com:/usr 17693 records 3.5 MB header 279 MB data
hessen.frs.dec.com:/usr 282 MB estimated
tbla2.frs.dec.com:/var/nsr/index/hessen.frs.dec.com 2 records 1 KB header
6.5 MB data
tbla2.frs.dec.com:/var/nsr/index/hessen.frs.dec.com 6.5 MB estimated
I really don't know what to do now. Do you have any other ideas?
Uwe
[Posted by WWW Notes gateway]
|
695.11 | | DECWET::GRAHAM | | Thu May 29 1997 10:05 | 7 |
| Uwe,
Do the 17693 files have anything in common? Maybe there is something
about the data that can help solve the mystery. Other than that, I
don't know what else to suggest.
Debbie
|
695.12 | once upon a time... | DECWET::EVANS | NSR Engineering | Mon Jun 02 1997 09:51 | 6 |
| a customer called in an IPMT to NetWorker Engineering swearing NetWorker
was broken. After 3 months of arduously researching this, it came down
to a cron entry that touched (altered the m-time) of every file in the
system, thus making NetWorker do a full (apparently) backup.
moral: watch your cron jobs.
|
695.13 | Solution.... | NNTPD::"[email protected]" | Uwe Noffke | Wed Jun 04 1997 01:20 | 28 |
| I finally found the reason for Networker's strange backup behaviour!
When I installed DU 4.0B on my workstation the system date had been set to
Jun 02 1997. I didn't realise that at first and it did no harm to my daily
work.
Then I installed the Networker client and experienced the large incremental
backups. Looking for reasons I found several files and directories dated
Jun 02 97. So I touched each of them to reset the modification date and time
to the current values. However, this didn't change Networker's backup
behaviour.
Not knowing what else to do I entered the note here to ask for help.
Today (Jun 04 1997) I looked again across the saveset indexes of my
workstation
and found that the size of the last incremental backup had shrinked down to
about 3 to 4 MB!
So I guess that touching the files in question was not sufficient. I think I
should have done another full backup after touching the ill-dated files to
"reset" Networker as well.
Sorry for causing any headaches and many thanks for all your answers!!
Kind regards
Uwe.
[Posted by WWW Notes gateway]
|