T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
676.1 | | DECWET::RWALKER | Roger Walker - Media Changers | Tue May 13 1997 10:41 | 6 |
| This is a hardware/driver issue that has been reported in
this notes file before. NetWorker does not control the
compression, that is done by the driver when the nrmt*h device
file is used. Unloading and reloading the tape in the
drive by hand will 'fix' the problem until the next
power outage.
|
676.2 | still at 2Gbytes per cartridge | NPSS::HUMMERS | | Tue May 20 1997 09:47 | 21 |
| Hmm, had looked for notes with a title of power, tlz6l and compression
and could not find anything related. If you can point me that
might help...
We are still not working at 4Gs per tape.
I have removed all tapes cartridges and relabeled all unused tapes,
next backups wrote at 2Gs again. Over the weekend this site was
powered down, on Sunday we restarted systems, including this nsr server.
Strange thing was the /dev/*rmt* special files were all missing?
Perhaps related to the missing devices, we had grown the /usr partition
at this time by saving /usr, repartitioning and restore. Anyway, we
did a MAKEDEV on all them again and, guess what, 2Gs per tape...
We did a dump to rmt0h and got over 4Gs on that tape.
So any hints would be helpfull.
thanks
\s\Rick
|
676.3 | low rate too | NPSS::HUMMERS | | Tue May 20 1997 09:54 | 3 |
| Oh, maybe related, we are only writing at 170-190 Kb/s too.
|
676.4 | wow, there it is... | DECWET::EVANS | NSR Engineering | Tue May 20 1997 11:00 | 19 |
| the "oh by the way" explains part of it. by writing at a slow rate, the tape
drive has insufficient data to cause tape streaming (constant tape media
motion), ergo, it stops and start.. each stop takes way valuable storage
space -- examples I've seen from the tape folks is appx *half*, whch matches
the symptoms you are reporting.
let's go down the big things: what length tape? what firmware rev? what kind
of data is getting backed up (oracle DB?). what else is going on with
this system when NetWorker is trying to run?
for example 60m tapes will never get more than appx 1.5-2G/tape, 90m
tapes get appx 2.5-3.5 and 120m tapes cannot be used in TLZ06L drives.
I think the latest rev is 4BQH, but verify that in the STKHLM::MAGTAPE
conference, ok!?
Is there a lot of thrashing from the disks while NetWorker is doing the
backup?? I mean, can you see or hear lots of activity from the disks.. and
are they being backed up via "save", or via "savegroup"?
|
676.5 | The rest of the story | REGENT::HUMMERS | | Wed May 21 1997 09:40 | 50 |
| ! let's go down the big things: what length tape? what firmware rev? what kind
! of data is getting backed up (oracle DB?). what else is going on with
! this system when NetWorker is trying to run?
OK, but first let me restate that this system was running 4Gb per cartridge for
the first 2 months of it's life with all the same hardware/software...
That said, on to the speeds and feeds
90 meter cartridges, the internal tlz06 is at FW 4BQE but the TLZ6Ls are at
0491 (I have been waitig for FS to find an upgrade cartridge here). We back
up a bunch of U*ix fileservers that total just over 120Gb. Fulls go once a
month on 2-5 systems each Sunday morning. There is a mix of Ultrix and D.U.
fileservers, total of 11 systems (counting this server). No SQL, no Oracle,
no NT (yet), just UFS bytes.
The system is a 3000 M800 with 160 Mb, FW 6.2, running V3.2C and NSR, err I
mean networker, V4.2B (patches up to 11 as appropriate). It nfs-serves /usr
(read only) to several (less than 30 active is a good guess) DECathena clients
as it's only other function in life. The root, /usr, /var and one quarter of
it's swap is on one internal rz26, three quarters of it's swap is on an
internal dedicated rz25. The CDrom, TLZ06, and internal RZ25+26 are on the
internal SCSI. There is a dual SCSI (PMmumbley_something) that has only a
TLZ6L on each channel. There is a single SCSI (PMmumbly_something) that has
4 RZ28s for index files, /nsr/index is spread over three of the RZ28s, no two
systems scheduled for FULLs are on the same index disk. The 'wire' to the
world of clients is a fddi and most clients are fddi. The system is not
logging any errors, save a few SCSI CAM errors.
I do label all the cartridges on the internal TLZ06 (the one that I get 4Gbs
on doing a dump -0uf /dev/[n]rmt0h) and generally only back up to the two
TLZ6Ls, although the TLZ06 sometimes gets pressed into service for backups if
we are running behind. The TLZ06 is always where the restores get done
from.
! Is there a lot of thrashing from the disks while NetWorker is doing the
! backup?? I mean, can you see or hear lots of activity from the disks.. and
! are they being backed up via "save", or via "savegroup"?
the disks are very quite based on greeen-led activity.
backups are all NSR server scheduled (does this answer the save/savegroup
question?)
Now my question.
Is the density determined at LABEL time and from then on a particular
cartridge is always that density or can compression be turned on/off on a
per save basis?
thanks
\s\Rick
|
676.6 | | DECWET::RWALKER | Roger Walker - Media Changers | Wed May 21 1997 10:12 | 20 |
| Compression on a DAT drive is set by a mode select by the driver
and may change for every data block writen if the software
desires.
NetWorker does not deal with the device at this level on UNIX.
The device file used selects the compression, a /dev/nrmt*h file
selects compression, /dev/nrmt*a does not.
Now it is up to the tape driver, knowing that you are using the
'h' or 'a' device, to set the compression. The driver sets the
compression every time it gets a unit attention telling it
that the tape has been changed. (The drive clears the compression
everytime a tape is loaded).
Here's the problem. The TLZ6L does not report the unit attenion
to both the changer driver and the tape driver as required by
the SCSI-2 spec. If the changer opens the device before the tape
driver, the tape driver does not know that the tape drive needs
the compression bit set so the data is not compressed. We can't
control or change this.
|
676.7 | is 4QBH the answer? | REGENT::HUMMERS | | Wed May 21 1997 12:19 | 21 |
| Thanks for the info on compression, that helps
! Here's the problem. The TLZ6L does not report the unit attenion
! to both the changer driver and the tape driver as required by
! the SCSI-2 spec. If the changer opens the device before the tape
! driver, the tape driver does not know that the tape drive needs
! the compression bit set so the data is not compressed. We can't
! control or change this.
So are you saying that this is my 2Gb vs 4Gb problem? If so then
further questions are -
1. will upgrading to 4BQH (or whatever is current) help my problem?
2. why did this server work for the first two months of it's life
at 4Gb then 'go off key'? Could that have been the power to the
drive alone going off (.0)?
if this is not an explanation for my current problem, where do I go
from here?
thanks
\s\Rick
|
676.8 | | DECWET::RWALKER | Roger Walker - Media Changers | Wed May 21 1997 12:21 | 3 |
| I have not heard of any firmware that fixes this problem.
I also do not have any idea where you could go since we
can't help here.
|
676.9 | Sigh | REGENT::HUMMERS | | Thu May 22 1997 07:22 | 8 |
| Thanks for your help with this, at least I have a better handle on
the problem, still V puzzling why it worked 100% of the time for the
first two months and then stained the sheets in the last month?
This is a 'bumma' sooo do you think if I grump and grouse in the
ASK_SSAG conference I could get this fixed?
\s\Rick
|
676.10 | | DECWET::RWALKER | Roger Walker - Media Changers | Thu May 22 1997 09:04 | 3 |
| DIGITAL doesn't buy these units from the vendor any more so I don't
expect we can get any fixed frimware. The only option I know
of is to change to a TLZ9L which is made by a different vendor.
|
676.11 | workaround? | REGENT::HUMMERS | | Tue Jun 03 1997 08:47 | 10 |
| Well I found that the drives were defaulting to non-compress mode (the
default switch setting). I switched the two tlz6ls to be compressed by
default and have been backing up at an average of 4500Mb per tape for
the last few days.
It's still a mystery why this changed after two months of consistant
compressed mode, to consistantly uncompressed?
thanks for your time and patience
\s\Rick
|