|
If you lost tape JFUL.001 and if you remove the
tape from the media index, then NetWorker knows
you have a copy of the data on the clone tape. Or
if JFUL.001 is in a jukebox and the clone tape is
in a jukebox, then remove JFUL.001 from the jukebox
and NetWorker should then try to use your clone
tape for the recover.
BTW, directed recover won't be in the NT release
until 4.4 is out.
|
| >I am trying recovery procedures and my latest bootstrap is: 8334 files 72 on
>volume JFUL.001. But I am also recovering from the clone tape, so I ran the
>scanner command against the clone tape it shows: bootstrap is 8334, files 5
>on volume JSTL.005. Why does the files show different?
The following paragraph from the nsrclone(8) man page should help
answer the question above. Cloning, as done by NetWorker, is not
an exact duplication of volumes, but rather a duplication of save
sets. The distinction is made because of the problems that exist
trying to duplicate sequential media.
Although the command line parameters allow one to specify volume names or
volume identifiers, nsrclone always copies complete save sets. Save sets
that are only partially contained on a specified volume will be completely
copied, so volumes may be requested during the cloning operation in addi-
tion to those specified on the command line. Note that nsrclone does not
perform simple volume duplication, but rather, copies full save sets to a
set of destination volumes in a given pool. If the first destination
volume chosen cannot hold all of the save sets to be copied, another volume
will be chosen. This allows one to use different kinds of media for each
copy, and allows for variable sized volumes, such as tapes.
|