[Search for users] [Overall Top Noters] [List of all Conferences] [Download this site]

Conference decwet::networker

Title:NetWorker
Notice:kits - 12-14, problem reporting - 41.*, basics 1-100
Moderator:DECWET::RANDALL.com::lenox
Created:Thu Oct 10 1996
Last Modified:Fri Jun 06 1997
Last Successful Update:Fri Jun 06 1997
Number of topics:750
Total number of notes:3361

574.0. "1 hour to start nsrd !!!!!!!!!!" by TRN02::FRASSINO () Sun Apr 13 1997 09:26

    Hi all,
    I've completed the migration from nsrv3.2A to nsr4.2B to a customer
    site with ~180 clients. Fortunately, the migration was successful,
    apart 8 hours spent in converting indexes. 
    After the installation I've applied the patch 12 in order to start
    well, and all is ok.
    The problem is at the startup. The nsrd process spent ~1 hour in
    license management ( 180 clients defined twice , so 360 clients ). 
    After this long, too long time, all the other processes are started
    well and all is ok.
    
    I've started the nsrd with -D4 option, and I've seen that this long
    time is really due to license verification for the clients.
    I know that this is a unusual situation ( how many customer have 180
    clients to manage ?) but, on the other side, the customer is critical
    for the same reason.
    I have to say that, for a Unix machine, a 1-hour startup time for a
    product is UNACCEPTABLE. 
    Please, could you give me a reasonable way to make this startup
    shorter? ( for example, make the license verification a "forked" deamon
    in order to have the application immediately available ?
    
    I have to point out that I haven't seen this behaviour in v3.2A.
    
    Any suggestion is well appreciated; I'll provide any information is
    needed in addition.
    
    Thanks!
    					Pierpa
T.RTitleUserPersonal
Name
DateLines
574.1debug output available?DECWET::CARRUTHERSLife gets easier when you realize you can't have everything.Mon Apr 14 1997 10:141
Can you post the debug output here for us to review?
574.2I'll have it in a few days.TRN02::FRASSINOMon Apr 14 1997 13:495
    Hi,
    I'll go to the cusomer site on Wednesday, and I'll take the daemon.log.
    Up to now, thanks for your attention.
    
    			Pierpa
574.3DECWET::FARLEEInsufficient Virtual um...er....Mon Apr 14 1997 14:3811
Pierpa,

I cannot think of any reason why the server should take so long.
It's not supposed to contact the clients during startup.
The output from the -D4 run would be most helpful.  In the meantime,
we'll try to figure out what is going on here by inspection.

Your customer is big, but we've seen bigger.  One in particular
is pushing 1000 clients...

Kevin
574.4SANITY::LEMONSAnd we thank you for your support.Wed Apr 23 1997 08:499
    What is an average startup time?  With ~130 clients, we're seeing nsrd
    consume ~95% of the cpu on an AlphaServer 2000, and run for ~15 minutes
    before spawning the other nsr processes.  This is with NetWorker Server
    for Digital UNIX V4.2B with patches, by the by.
    
    Our upgrade to the V4.3 field test is imminent; I'll take a look at
    this issue with the next release.
    
    tl
574.5this is being worked via emailDECWET::EVANSNSR EngineeringThu Apr 24 1997 18:431
and is under investigation
574.6The logs are available !!!TRN02::FRASSINOFri Apr 25 1997 04:4818
    Hi all,
    I apologize for my silence, but only today I've the logs available.
    I've them on the node i1vvp.trn.dec.com ( 16.192.144.83), available using 
    anonymous ftp,under pub/NSR_AVIO directory. You will find the nsrd -D4 
    output and the daemon.log in two different Z files. I
    n the daemon.log you will see the 50 minutes startuptime of nsrd before 
    forking all the nsr stuff.
    The nsr server is an Alpha 1000 with 256 MB memory, 730 MB swap area.
    Any explanation is really well accepted ( V3.2A was absolutely not so
    slow in startup )!!
    
    
    				Pierpa
    
    P.S.
    To speak with me offline, send me mails on TRN02::frassino or
    frassino@trn ( allin1 ).
    I will be on  vacation next week, and I'll be back the 5th of may.
574.7Pierpa!!DECWET::EVANSNSR EngineeringThu May 01 1997 15:3710
well, I'm fetching them now, but you typed in "NSR_AVIO", and it really
 was "AVIO_NSR" - growl, growl... :-)

thanks for letting me do "ls" to figure it out!!!  :-)

I'll take a gander through the files when the transfer is done, and see
 if there is something to help us...

Thank you for posting them!!  I've been struggling to construct a set of
 clients that would approximate this.
574.8findings...DECWET::EVANSNSR EngineeringThu May 01 1997 16:1116
date 4/16/97, times start: 15:50, end: 17:02

15:51 to 16:38 spent in LMF checks (NetWorker licenses) == 47 minutes

16:38 to 16:41 spent verifying volumes                  ==  3 minutes

16:41 to 17:02 spent checking index files               == 21 minutes

Number of clients: 171 (clients), 1 server.

Notes:
 each client was granted a license, yet it also was reported as 
 "already licensed".

I'm going to see what tests can be run up on this to see why licensing
 takes so long. More when there's data to report.
574.9more dataDECWET::EVANSNSR EngineeringThu May 01 1997 18:084
my V4.3 install ran 19 clients (17 clients + 2 exempt) in 15 seconds,
 and had no "already licensed" messages.

still thinking...
574.10Other infos.TRN02::FRASSINOWed May 07 1997 09:1815
    Bruce,
    yesterday I was at the customer site and I investigated about my
    problem.
    First of all I've to say that you see "already licensed" probably
    because any client is defined twice.So this should be normal.
    In addition I've seen that the Alphaserver 1000 takes ~10 seconds per
    client to check the license, and during the license check the CPU is
    96-97% in system time, 3-4% user time and 0% idle.
    For this reason I suppose that there is no chance, since the hardware
    is working at its top.
    Do you agree or there is a "tuning trick" to apply, eventually?
    
    Thanks in advance,
    
    				Pierpa
574.11we are going to run tests (someday)DECWET::EVANSNSR EngineeringThu May 15 1997 11:381
when I have time... famous line around here lately...