| Title: | NetWorker |
| Notice: | kits - 12-14, problem reporting - 41.*, basics 1-100 |
| Moderator: | DECWET::RANDALL .com::lenox |
| Created: | Thu Oct 10 1996 |
| Last Modified: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
| Last Successful Update: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
| Number of topics: | 750 |
| Total number of notes: | 3361 |
Is there any reason why NetWorker ( V4.2B with all patches applied )
always takes a full_level backup of an ASE V1.3 service ?
The ase service is an NFS service ( ADVFS on an LSM volume, containing
rather important informations ).
The backups get launched with a schedule defined on the NetWorker
server, each time it gets kicked of it says that no cycles were found
in the database and therefore starts a full level backup.
As such it is not so bad since the backup is taken succesfully,
however it makes use of much more tape(s) as would be needed when
following the intended schedule ( full/incremmantl(s) ).
Is there anything I can do about this .....????
Your advises are very welcome ..!
Geert\\\
| T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 557.1 | DECWET::ONO | Software doesn't break-it comes broken | Tue Apr 08 1997 10:03 | 7 | |
For some reason NetWorker is not recognizing the ASE service name as one that has been previously backed up. This sometimes happens if the ASE service name is mixed case. savegroup -pnv -G <groupname> should provide useful information. Wes | |||||
| 557.2 | BACHUS::DEVOS | Manu Devos DEC/SI Brussels 856-7539 | Wed Apr 09 1997 01:18 | 13 | |
Hi Geert,
Also, NSR is very sensitive to the position of the Service Alias in
/etc/hosts. If the service is called nfsosf, then:
10.11.12.13 nfsosf NFSOSF nfsosf1 -> working !!!
10.11.12.13 NFSOSF nfsosf nfsosf1 -> NOT working !!!
10.11.12.13 nsfosf1 NFSOSF nfsosf -> NOT working !!!
Maybe, the order has been changed in /etc/hosts...
Manu.
| |||||