Title: | NetWorker |
Notice: | kits - 12-14, problem reporting - 41.*, basics 1-100 |
Moderator: | DECWET::RANDALL .com::lenox |
Created: | Thu Oct 10 1996 |
Last Modified: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
Last Successful Update: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
Number of topics: | 750 |
Total number of notes: | 3361 |
Hello, I'm working with dec nsr 4.2B on Digital Unix 4.0, save versions on the client and on the server. I see the following behaviour: I define pool1 (with label lab1) that uses an optical disk (which is actualy a file on my disk since I don't have a tape). This pool is used only by one client that does allways a full backup, this client is the only one in group1. Everything is quite simple since I'm doing some testings for a customer problem. The level defined in the pool is full. When I start group1 I see the following messages: Thu 18:12:23 savegroup info: starting group2 (with 2 clients) Thu 18:12:29 savegroup info: zaghi1.mln.dec.com:/usr/users/gea/nsr2 no cycles found in media db; doing full save Thu 18:12:31 media info: label a new writable volume for pool `pool2' Thu 18:12:32 media waiting event: backup to pool 'pool2' waiting for 1 writable backup disk Thu 18:13:12 /usr/nastri/dev2 mounted optical disk label2.001 Thu 18:13:12 media event cleared: backup to pool 'pool2' waiting for 1 writable backup disk Thu 18:13:12 zaghi1.mln.dec.com:/usr/users/gea/nsr2 saving to pool 'pool2' (label2.001) Thu 18:13:14 zaghi1.mln.dec.com:/usr/users/gea/nsr2 done saving to pool 'pool2' (label2.001) Thu 18:13:51 media info: label a new writable volume for pool `Default' Thu 18:13:51 media waiting event: backup to pool 'Default' waiting for 1 writable backup disk The problem is caused by the 'backup to pool 'Default' waiting for 1 writable backup disk' the pool default isn't used and has no devices associated with it. If I add level 9 in pool1 the problem no longer appears. Is this a know feature? I tried to access dec west patch repository but is down. Thanks, Gea
T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
444.1 | DECWET::RWALKER | Roger Walker - Media Changers | Thu Feb 27 1997 09:38 | 2 | |
Yes the client index save is set for a level 9 on an incremental backup. | |||||
444.2 | full backup | MLNCSC::VOCI | Fri Feb 28 1997 00:26 | 4 | |
But I was doing a full backup, and it was the first one on theta particular client. Gea | |||||
444.3 | DECWET::LENOX | Why is DECdirect so out of date? | Fri Feb 28 1997 07:45 | 8 | |
Pool Default is not used for the client data, but for the client's index (which is on the server), which is saved at level 9 (always). One can change that, but it can slow down disaster recovery. This is discussed in various places in the old notes conference (DECWET::DECNSR). You've already got the workaround that has been suggested for others encountering this. | |||||
444.4 | Must explicitly specify FULL | DECWET::RWALKER | Roger Walker - Media Changers | Fri Feb 28 1997 17:05 | 11 |
Just to be clear. The only way to be sure that the index save will go to a full pool is to specify a full save. This can be done by the 'savegrp -l full' command or by a scheduled save that calls for a full via the calendar associated with that client. Any save you start by the group control will be an incremental. If there has not been a previous full for the client it will promote the client data saves to fulls, this will still leave the index/bootstrap save at level 9. | |||||
444.5 | thanks | MLNCSC::VOCI | Mon Mar 03 1997 02:20 | 3 | |
Thanks for the infos. Gea |