[Search for users] [Overall Top Noters] [List of all Conferences] [Download this site]

Conference decwet::networker

Title:NetWorker
Notice:kits - 12-14, problem reporting - 41.*, basics 1-100
Moderator:DECWET::RANDALL.com::lenox
Created:Thu Oct 10 1996
Last Modified:Fri Jun 06 1997
Last Successful Update:Fri Jun 06 1997
Number of topics:750
Total number of notes:3361

179.0. "Chained TL82x's?" by HERON::INKINEN () Sun Nov 24 1996 03:48

T.RTitleUserPersonal
Name
DateLines
179.1SSDEVO::ROLLOWDr. File System's Home for Wayward Inodes.Sun Nov 24 1996 09:0057
179.2DECWET::KOWALSKITime's not for savingSun Nov 24 1996 17:235
179.3NABETH::alanDr. File System's Home for Wayward Inodes.Mon Nov 25 1996 13:014
179.4SANITY::LEMONSAnd we thank you for your support.Thu Apr 17 1997 10:238
    So, just to put a fine point on this, NetWorker supports more than one
    TL8nn on the same server only if the MUSL (_not_ MUML) firmware is used
    by all of the TL8nn devices.
    
    True?
    
    Thanks
    tl
179.5Logical or physical??SUBSYS::TRANStraight <Left> Hitter..Thu Apr 17 1997 10:297
    
    May be just semantics -
    
    When you link TL820 Series towers together and using MUSL (FW version
    2A5A), it's considered by the server as ONE jukebox not multiple jukeboxes.
    
    T.
179.6DECWET::FARLEEInsufficient Virtual um...er....Thu Apr 17 1997 12:4111
If you have multiple TL82x towers bolted together:

If you run the MUSL firmware, NetWorker will see it as one BIG jukebox,
and respond accordingly.

If you run the MUML firmware, NetWorker will see it as multiple
independant jukeboxes, incapable of interchanging tapes.

In either case you are supported.

Kevin
179.7SANITY::LEMONSAnd we thank you for your support.Thu Apr 17 1997 13:286
    Kevin
    
    Ah!  I didn't know that MUML was supported.  Good to know.
    
    Thanks!
    tl
179.8SANITY::LEMONSAnd we thank you for your support.Fri Apr 18 1997 09:046
    I'm planning to use NetWorker Server for Digital UNIX with a
    TL893-TL896 MUSL set.  Any problems with this?  In FY98, this may grow
    to a TL893-TL896-TL893-TL893 set.  Any problems there?
    
    Thanks!
    tl
179.9DECWET::RWALKERRoger Walker - Media ChangersFri Apr 18 1997 15:062
	NetWorker has been verified with a full 5 tower setup.  We 
	use a 3-6-3 here all the time.
179.10SSDEVO::ROLLOWDr. File System's Home for Wayward Inodes.Sat Apr 19 1997 10:308
	Roger, I think the concern is over mixing drives instead of
	mixing capacities.  CompacTape IVs written by a TZ89 look
	blank when read on a TZ88 is one potential problem.  When
	mixing either the 88 or 89 with TZ87s the problems can get
	worse, since the TZ87 doesn't like the CompacTape IVs that
	might be in the library.  This isn't as much a problem on
	Digital UNIX or NT, can be a hassle on OpenVMS when you get
	a CompacTape IV stuck in a TZ87.
179.11DECWET::RWALKERRoger Walker - Media ChangersSun Apr 20 1997 00:252
    Alan, .8 showed all units being upgraded to TZ89 drives.  I agree,
    you don't want to mix drive types.