| Title: | PATHWORKS Troubleshooting Hints and Tips |
| Moderator: | UTURBO::SWEEP |
| Created: | Tue Dec 12 1995 |
| Last Modified: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
| Last Successful Update: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
| Number of topics: | 59 |
| Total number of notes: | 313 |
Would regular RMS maintenance on the ISAM files used by PATHWORKS make
much of difference?
First, the indexed files I'm aware of are:
PWRK$LANMAN:SHAREFILE.
PWRK$LANMAN:FATVOL.DAT
PWRK$ROOT:[LANNAN.DATAFILES]ACCOUNTS.LMX
Others?
Next, would the following simple operation provide benefit (assuming
the file(s) in question were fairly volatile)? Obviously, this
would need to be done off-line:
$ ANAL/RMS/FDL <file> ! Produces <file>.FDL
$ EDIT/FDL/NOINTER/ANALYSIS=<file>.FDL ! Produces <file>.FDL;2
$ CONVER/FDL=<file>.FDL;2 <file> <file> ! Produces new indexed file
thanks,
Paul
| T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 54.1 | ex | UTRTSC::EISINK | No Kipling apes today | Fri Mar 21 1997 00:39 | 9 |
Yes,
all the rms tuning you've learned is still valid here. Also check the
retrival pointers, check hot files.
Move files when you can like the uas file to a less loaded disk, make
the file contiguass etc.
Rob
| |||||