Title: | PATHWORKS Troubleshooting Hints and Tips |
Moderator: | UTURBO::SWEEP |
Created: | Tue Dec 12 1995 |
Last Modified: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
Last Successful Update: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
Number of topics: | 59 |
Total number of notes: | 313 |
Would regular RMS maintenance on the ISAM files used by PATHWORKS make much of difference? First, the indexed files I'm aware of are: PWRK$LANMAN:SHAREFILE. PWRK$LANMAN:FATVOL.DAT PWRK$ROOT:[LANNAN.DATAFILES]ACCOUNTS.LMX Others? Next, would the following simple operation provide benefit (assuming the file(s) in question were fairly volatile)? Obviously, this would need to be done off-line: $ ANAL/RMS/FDL <file> ! Produces <file>.FDL $ EDIT/FDL/NOINTER/ANALYSIS=<file>.FDL ! Produces <file>.FDL;2 $ CONVER/FDL=<file>.FDL;2 <file> <file> ! Produces new indexed file thanks, Paul
T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
54.1 | ex | UTRTSC::EISINK | No Kipling apes today | Fri Mar 21 1997 00:39 | 9 |
Yes, all the rms tuning you've learned is still valid here. Also check the retrival pointers, check hot files. Move files when you can like the uas file to a less loaded disk, make the file contiguass etc. Rob |