T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
48.1 | Think its a known problem | DUNKLE::MCDERMOTT | Chris McDermott - Software Janitorial Services | Tue Feb 11 1997 18:36 | 4 |
| I think that this is a known problem that is due to be fixed in V50E-ECO1. I
also beleive that there is a patch available for it. If you want the patch for
yourself or more information contact Dave Cook: CPEEDY::COOK. If you need that
patch for a customer they will need to submit an IPMT case.
|
48.2 | | UTRTSC::SWEEP | I want a lolly... | Wed Feb 12 1997 09:13 | 7 |
| I don't think this is a server issue. All IRIS traces show that
the client doesn't send a ULOGOFF. So how do we know we should
get rid of the share.
Paul only mentioned it as an info. message.
Adrie
|
48.3 | | DUNKLE::MCDERMOTT | Chris McDermott - Software Janitorial Services | Wed Feb 12 1997 16:35 | 19 |
| >> > We have seen this problem only with 3.11 redir (VREDIR) and only to a
>> > pathworks server.
> I don't think this is a server issue. All IRIS traces show that
> the client doesn't send a ULOGOFF. So how do we know we should
> get rid of the share.
>
> Paul only mentioned it as an info. message.
>
> Adrie
I think the problem is that the client has two sessions to the server: guest
(blank username) and the normal user both connected to the share. The use/d is
disconnecting the guest from the share but not the normal user.
Chris
|