[Search for users] [Overall Top Noters] [List of all Conferences] [Download this site]

Conference jamin::pathworks32

Title:	Digital PATHWORKS 32

Moderator:	SPELNK::curless

Created:	Fri Nov 01 1996
Last Modified:	Fri Jun 06 1997
Last Successful Update:	Fri Jun 06 1997
Number of topics:	337
Total number of notes:	1612

310.0. "LAT Development Kit?" by CGOOA::OWONG (SKIWI in Canada (VAO)) Wed May 21 1997 19:05

    I am beta testing the next version of Attachmate's Kea! 340 product and
    the LAT stuff doesn't work with PATHWORKS32 since the LAT implementation
    has changed.
    
    How can I get information for Attachmate?  My contact there says they
    have talked with Digital but are still waiting for information on a LAT
    development kit.
    
    Thanks for any pointers...
    
    	Owen.

T.R	Title	User	Personal Name	Date	Lines
310.1		JAMIN::MAJEWSKI		`Thu May 22 1997 08:51`	9
	what API is Attachmate using? directly to LAT? thru terminal access library? Does KEA! 340 work with PATHWORKS for Windows 95 V1.0/1.0a? Make sure they have the programmer's reference for PATHWORKS 32. There have been changes to terminal access, and LAT.
310.2		CGOOA::OWONG	SKIWI in Canada (VAO)	`Thu May 22 1997 11:16`	11
	Kea! V4.23 (the current production release) certainly worked with PATHWORKS for Windows 95 so I assume the API used is whatever worked with that version. The problem I have at the moment is with PATHWORKS32 on an Alpha NT V4.0 SP3 system - I will try Kea! on Windows 95 as well. Attachmate just told me their PATHWORKS32 kit had arrived - does that kit contain all the programmer's info as well? Owen.
310.3		JAMIN::TBAKER	DOS With Honor	`Thu May 22 1997 11:37`	9
	It should have the right information. The problem WRQ was having with talking to our LAT was that they were using a lower interface. They were talking directly to our LAT and not through our terminal access library. Tell them to use DECTAL. It will make all our lives simpler. Tom
310.4		CGOOA::OWONG	SKIWI in Canada (VAO)	`Thu May 22 1997 17:11`	8
	Turns out they hadn't updated the NT variant for LAT support; the Windows 95 variant of their beta works fine. I'm expecting the fix to show up in the next beta release. Thanks for all the help. Owen.