T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
292.1 | | TOHOPE::WSA028::DOWNING_L | | Mon May 12 1997 14:28 | 1 |
| You may also want to ask this in the TAPE::INFOSERVER notesfile.
|
292.2 | A PW32 issue ? | BARNA::DSMAIL | | Wed May 14 1997 07:00 | 10 |
| hello !
Let me explain a little bit more
If I create a service in the infoserver
INFOSERVER>CREATE SERVICE service_name for DKX: CLASS V2.0
I can see and connect it from PW 6 but not from PW32
I thing it should be a Pathworks issue I couldnt find any reference in
TAPE::INFOSERVER.
Thanks in advance Josep.
|
292.3 | pw32 v7.0 supports CDs only not disks | JAMIN::A_MURPHY | | Wed May 14 1997 14:57 | 4 |
| PATHWORKS 32 V7.0 does not support InfoServer disks. It only supports
CDs.
Anita Murphy
|
292.4 | | FARPNT::WSA028::DOWNING_L | | Wed May 14 1997 15:14 | 8 |
| Re:3
Since he is talking about disk's being changed, it sounds like he IS talking
about CD's.
re:2, why do you need to do a CREATE SERVICE command? A FAT-based CD should
automatically create a V2.0 service, that is, if it can read the label and
determine the record type.
Still, if v6 can see it, pw32 should see it too.
|
292.5 | Infoserver and disk changes | JAMIN::A_MURPHY | | Wed May 14 1997 17:31 | 44 |
|
In order not to have to connect again when changing CDs, the customer
can create a service name on the InfoServer that represents
a CD. For example, if they have the MSDN CD loaded, the default service
name is the same as the CD's Volume label (MSDN). If they create service
names on the InfoServer, such as CD1, CD2, etc, for all CD drives, and
connect to those service names instead, then they can swap CDs and keep the
connections.
If you use the MS-DOS "NET USE" or Explorer, you won't see any InfoServers,
because the InfoServer software supplied with PATHWORKS 32 V7.0 for use on
NT V4.0 Servers does not include an InfoServer Network Provider. You need
to use the command line utility infocon for browsing, connecting etc. However,
after you have connected an InfoServer drive using infocon, the connected drive
does appear in Explorer. Infocon was meant to be used by a system administrator
on an NT V4.0 Server, where you have installed PATHWORKS 32 V7.0 with InfoServer
support. The system administrator can then create an InfoServer file share on this
Server that any desktop client can use.
The storage group has taken the InfoServer NT drivers and added Net
Provider Software that allows using the Explorer to View and connect
InfoServers. The part number is QA-YSHAG-H8.
It's available for internal use also:
The kit can be retrieved using a web browser from the following location:
http://dtb13.shr.dec.com/InfoServer/wnt_client/v10/
or copy from
tape::ess:[public.ess.kit.wnt_client_v1]
The storage product is V1.0 now and supports NT 4.0 connections to CD-ROMS
only. V1.1 will add hard disk connections.
Currently, we plan to add disk support and the InfoServer network provider
to PATHWORKS 32 V7.1.
|
292.6 | Yes but No | BARNA::DSMAIL | | Thu May 15 1997 04:31 | 12 |
|
Hello all
First Paragraph of reply 5 , is what I m looking for , but the fact
is that as stated in reply 3 , if I create a service for a CD as you
said I can not see it with the command INFOCON \\infoserver_name.
with Pw 32 , the same service with PW 6 appears OK. Perhaps this
limitation has any relationship with the fact that fixed disks are
not supported.
I checked it at office with same results that at customer side
Is this the expected behaviour?
Thanks Josep.
|
292.7 | | TOHOPE::WSA028::DOWNING_L | | Thu May 15 1997 14:46 | 18 |
| re .6
I think I understand what you are saying.
INFOCON (ie, a PATHWORKS 32 Windows NT Server) can see a service for a CD that
is Automounted on a Infoserver, but cannot see a service that you manually
created by the "Create Service" command that is pointing to that same CD
drive.
However, a PATHWORKS V6 client can see both the Automounted service and
the manually created service?
If this is the case, do you see any differences in the two Services as seen
from the InfoServer with the SHOW SERVICE servicename FULL?
I wonder if a PATHWORKS 32 client using INFOCON still looks for a service with a
V2.0 Class, or is it now looking for an ISO_9660 class?
|
292.8 | Solved | BARNA::DSMAIL | | Fri May 16 1997 04:15 | 8 |
| HI !
Thanks a lot , your clue solved the problem.
The only that must be done is creating the service as ISO_9660 class
instead of a V2.0 class.
Josep Burgues
|