| Title: | Digital PATHWORKS 32 |
| Moderator: | SPELNK::curless |
| Created: | Fri Nov 01 1996 |
| Last Modified: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
| Last Successful Update: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
| Number of topics: | 337 |
| Total number of notes: | 1612 |
Has anyone else seen a problem with writing to line 25 of vt320.
The customer said it worked in 1.0a and it works with powerterm but not
with the 7.0 version of vt320.
Jeff Kinser
| T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 169.1 | JAMIN::MCCARRON | Tue Mar 18 1997 11:42 | 7 | ||
We haven't seen this here. I've tested writing to the status line
(line 25) and it looks OK. What platform are they running: W95,
NT-Intel or NT-Alpha? Are they using the SSB version (7.0.033) or a
field test version?
bruce,
| |||||
| 169.2 | thanks | VMSNET::KINSER_J | Tue Mar 18 1997 15:53 | 6 | |
They are on w95 and using the shipped version. They never had field
test. They are going to use powerterm instead for now.
They were using a product called "multisession" I believe.
Jeff
| |||||
| 169.3 | JAMIN::OSMAN | Eric Osman, dtn 226-7122 | Thu Apr 17 1997 17:57 | 15 | |
I just tested with a command procedure that you're welcome to try:
jamin::user1:[osman.comfiles]25th_line.com
This procedure updates the 25th line to indicate what program you're
running, amongst other information. For example, after you start
it (with "@" of course) try running emacs.
It seems to work fine with both vtstar and powerterm. On vt320
emulator I notice that the emulator leaves reverse-video on in the main
terminal body, which looks like the emulator fails to maintain seperate
state for status line and main body.
/Eric
| |||||