T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
1922.1 | | CHEFS::zkodhcp-29-48-237.zko.dec.com::PITT | Gone with the winsock ... | Fri Apr 18 1997 14:43 | 9 |
| WRT SPDs, please note that AV does not use SPDs. This is a
Digital concept. Therefore, the SPD you quote is not the
right one to use.
Now this leads to a question about the "official" statement
of functionality. Where is it? I don't actually believe
such a thing exists.
T
|
1922.2 | FCS date is 5/5 | BRSADV::DESCHUYTER | De Schuyter@BRO DTN:856-7543 | Wed Apr 30 1997 06:02 | 13 |
| What I found In the AltaVista Partner Pavilion :
>By:derarslanian On:1997/04/23
>
>The firewall 97 software is being submitted today to manufacturing.
>The FCS date is 5/5. You can then place an order for the version upgrade
>that is priced at 35% of the full kit price.
Regards,
Stefan,-
|
1922.3 | AVFU 3.0 as tunnel server also ? | PRMS00::COLE | | Fri May 23 1997 09:41 | 19 |
| Questions on AltaVista Firewall 97/Unix and Tunnel:
1) Can Firewall be a Group Tunnel Server and still support
Remote Management ? Is this a reasonble configuration or
should Tunnel Server be on another system ?
2) Assuming above is viable, will installation of the Group
Tunnel Software on the Firewall system recognize the existance
of the tunnel bits installed with the Firewall and not disturb
the existing remote management tunnel config data ?
3) Any thought about bundling one WIN95 Tunnel Client with Firewall 97
- customers will want it and many sales people will forget to
include it on the order
...larry
|