| Title: | SEAL |
| Moderator: | GALVIA::SMITH |
| Created: | Mon Mar 21 1994 |
| Last Modified: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
| Last Successful Update: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
| Number of topics: | 1989 |
| Total number of notes: | 8209 |
Is it possible to have two wwwproxies running at different ports on the
firewall?
If so it would be possible to set up groups with 3.0 with different
access rights without resorting to measures like the ones I asked about
in a previous note (2001?).
Bj�rn
| T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1903.1 | Sorry, 1901! | OSL09::BJORNMY | Open but Secure | Thu Apr 03 1997 02:32 | 2 |
Sorry, notes reference in previous note should be 1901. Too much
influence from SF :-)
| |||||
| 1903.2 | CHEFS::16.202.2.132::PITT | Gone with the winsock ... | Thu Apr 03 1997 05:51 | 20 | |
Well, I did two proxies on AFWU V2 for a customer... It was a interesting exercise, because one of the control files (the acl file, I think) has its name embedded in the proxy itself. As a result, I had to patch the image to make a new version that used a different file. (Since I don't know UNIX well enough, I took the file over to VMS and used Patch/Absolute!) It works a treat. The customer wanted a few IP addresses to be allowed all WWW access at all times. They want all other addresses to be allowed http only, and only outside working hours... It was "fun" to set up. I haven't looked to see whether this is easier in V3, but Galway did say at the time that the filename should not have been hard-coded in the image ... T | |||||