| T.R | Title | User | Personal
Name | Date | Lines |
|---|
| 1764.1 | 2 wwwproxy log questions for DFWS | NETRIX::"[email protected]" | Arthur Lin | Mon Feb 03 1997 21:20 | 20 |
| I just installed a DFWS system in which the CERN httpd was installed
seperately and was not handled by the firewall kit. So I had the following
two questions :
1. How to let httpd's log be controlled by syslogd, like telnetd & ftpxd ?
(What I want is to make httpd.log be handled by syslogd and thus this
log can be forwarded to the mailgate. )
2. How to modify httpd.conf to change the format of httpd's log
from the format
<source> - - [<date> +8000] GET <URL> 200 <size>
to the format (DFWU's format, like telnetxd.log, ftpxd.log)
<date> httpd[serial number] <date> <URL> ...
Looking foward replies !!
- Arthur -
[Posted by WWW Notes gateway]
|
| 1764.2 | | QUICHE::PITT | Alph a ha is better than no VAX! | Wed Feb 05 1997 08:47 | 15 |
|
DFWU V2.0 required an LMF licence PAK. The pak did not actually limit
the number of nodes in any way.
AFWU V2.1 does not require a licence PAK.
In both cases, the customer is on his honour to buy the licence for the
produc that is appropriate to the number of nodes on the protected
network. Note that wording: it is a 50 node licence, not a 50
concurrent user licence, or anything like that. If there are 201 nodes
with IP stacks on the internal network, the customer MUST buy an
unlimited licence, even if only one of those machines is permitted to
use the services of the firewall ...
T
|
| 1764.3 | | BIGUN::nessus.cao.dec.com::Mayne | Wake up, time to die | Thu Feb 06 1997 23:02 | 9 |
| > If there are 201 nodes
> with IP stacks on the internal network, the customer MUST buy an
How about the case where there is a single internal system with both DECnet and
TCP/IP, and all the other systems are DECnet only. The DECnet systems are being
equally protected by the firewall, so it seems to me they should also
participate in the licensing. No?
PJDM
|