| Title: | VAX FTAM |
| Notice: | Conference locked, use SMAUG::OSI_APPL_SUPPORT |
| Moderator: | VMSVTP::S_WATTUM |
| Created: | Tue Aug 30 1988 |
| Last Modified: | Wed Sep 01 1993 |
| Last Successful Update: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
| Number of topics: | 470 |
| Total number of notes: | 2123 |
| T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 209.1 | V1.1A and V2.0 should interoperate | FORTY2::DALLAS | Paul Dallas, OSAK @REO2-F/F2 | Tue Aug 13 1991 05:59 | 3 |
| 209.2 | Which "version" of V2.0 are you using? | FORTY2::DALLAS | Paul Dallas, OSAK @REO2-F/F2 | Tue Aug 13 1991 06:00 | 1 |
| 209.3 | Savesets with "large" record size would fail - Feature of FTAM! | SMAUG::PATEL | Rasesh Patel - OSI Applications | Tue Aug 13 1991 09:50 | 7 |
| 209.4 | more info | GIDDAY::DRANSFIELD | Mike Dransfield, Sydney RSSG | Tue Aug 13 1991 21:38 | 19 |
| 209.5 | What causes this limit? | JRDV04::I_MURAKAMI | ISEDA/Japan | Wed Aug 14 1991 00:32 | 8 |
| 209.6 | SSDU size | SMAUG::PATEL | Rasesh Patel - OSI Applications | Wed Aug 14 1991 11:38 | 30 |
| 209.7 | no more copying savesets with 1.1-93 and 2.0? | GIDDAY::DRANSFIELD | Mike Dransfield, Sydney RSSG | Wed Aug 14 1991 20:01 | 6 |
| 209.8 | isn't 32k support desired? | JRDV04::I_MURAKAMI | ISEDA/Japan | Thu Aug 15 1991 03:18 | 29 |
| 209.9 | FORTY2::DALLAS | Paul Dallas, OSAK @REO2-F/F2 | Thu Aug 15 1991 07:13 | 31 | |
| 209.10 | 1.1-93 shouldn't hang | GIDDAY::DRANSFIELD | Mike Dransfield, Sydney RSSG | Thu Aug 15 1991 20:48 | 17 |
| 209.11 | 7k checking? | GLDOA::DSMITH | Fri Aug 16 1991 14:49 | 50 | |
| 209.12 | another vote for big records | GIDDAY::DRANSFIELD | Mike Dransfield, Sydney RSSG | Wed Aug 21 1991 00:53 | 5 |