T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
2236.1 | any comment/answer from engineering/product management? | ULYSSE::BALLETTA | | Thu Dec 19 1996 11:33 | 4 |
2236.2 | LK450 Is Effectively An Orphan... | XDELTA::HOFFMAN | Steve, OpenVMS Engineering | Thu Dec 19 1996 15:55 | 13 |
2236.3 | shame that our engineering quality had to drop that low.. | ULYSSE::BALLETTA | | Tue Jan 07 1997 06:07 | 33 |
2236.4 | The solution is ... | PCBUOA::FERRANTEV | | Fri Jan 24 1997 19:43 | 95 |
| >>>>>>
FLAME ON.. (as we used to say in the old days)
And it is a shame that you never FORMALLY reported the problem to the
service center, called for help or any other action that might have
gotten you some useful information..
FLAME OFF
Many portables engineers read and respond to this notes files and
notably, the man in charge of service is a frequent supplier of
pointers, fixes and help. Gee how could you have missed that.
The problems that you are 'discussing' in this note are all related to
the same issue. A failure of the KB BIOS (Mouse also) to maintain sync
with the external device.
In any case, the mouse problem was known, was resolved with drivers and
re-appeared under NT4.0 and in some production units. We have addressed
this problem and anyone calling to report mouse problems is asked to
return their unit for a new veriosn of the KB BIOS. This is not a
flashable item and must be physically changed at a service center.
The latest version of the system BIOS is 1.05 (A or D) and the KB BIOS
is V 1.04 (A or J). These 2 combined resolve the 'wild' mouse issue in
ALL operating systems but there still exists an issue with Japanese
Win95 under LOW LOW battery and other extreme conditions that is being
addressed as we read this.
I do not know what product that Marc Bassine developed the keyboard
driver for but I do not believe it was for the DEC HiNote VP 500.
Incompatible KB and Mouse voltages and signal characteristics will
definitely cause problems. This has not been identified as the problem
here. Over running the buffer and losing one's place on the screen were
resolved in the BIOS updates. Several users are happily using LK450
keyboards on their VP systems but I am sure that there are one or two
of the older ones (KB that is) that might have a problem. I will dig
out mine again and try it on the system and in the prot Replicator.
If you have lost your pride in the DEC portables systems, I suggest that
you take as good a look at our competition with the same 'additional'
hardware that you are using on the DEC gear and let us know the
results. I know for a fact that we have resolved many problems that
other leading manufacturers are happy to ship with and tell the
customer that 'it is not supported on this system'.
Please take a better look at what we are accomplishing before you take
such a critical attitude of the DEC engineers and Product Managers. I
have never met any of them that would not stop what they are doing and
help, listen or point you in the proper direction for resolution.
Vin
>>>>>>
.-1
Thanks for the advise. I have spoken with the former keyboard driver
writer
Marc Bassinne) and he explained that he had seen that problem before.
It's typically related to poor compatibility of the ext keyboard port
or
to extreme sensitivity to electromagnetic noise.
So far I have experienced (with or without the docking bay) the
following
glitches while working with this "jewel":
1) on occasion (it can repeat every few seconds) the keyboard and
the mouse pointer lock. No input is taken from the keyboard, no
movement of the mouse affect the mouse pointer on the screen.
The only workaround is to press <ALT> to unlock
2) sudden movements (up to half the screen) of the mouse pointer even
with
external mouse
3) as in (2) combined with "unwanted" text selection (one such event
forced me to rewrite the text of this note)
4) inability to reduce the volume of the loudspeakers when
a PCMCIA modem card is in use
5) on occasions the LK450 keyboard generates two or more repeated
characters
Natural enough I have the latest version of the BIOS installed.
Who is in charge of supporting the HiNote VP 500?
It's a shame that neither one of the engineers nor the product manager
had
the guts so far to step in the discussion, but obviously I can
understand why.
Now in front of our customers I can not display anymore the technology
pride
of the old good days!
Little by little all the assets of this company are disappearing into
nothingness ... shame!
|
2236.5 | We might be better, Where can we improve? | XDELTA::HOFFMAN | Steve, OpenVMS Engineering | Fri Jan 31 1997 14:34 | 36 |
|
: I do not know what product that Marc Bassine developed the keyboard
: driver for but I do not believe it was for the DEC HiNote VP 500.
Mark is/was one of the players involved with the LK450 keyword work,
a popular keyboard for those with PCs that need to work with Digital
gear... See SUTRA::LK450.
: If you have lost your pride in the DEC portables systems, I suggest that
: you take as good a look at our competition with the same 'additional'
: hardware that you are using on the DEC gear and let us know the
: results. I know for a fact that we have resolved many problems that
: other leading manufacturers are happy to ship with and tell the
: customer that 'it is not supported on this system'.
You just can't keep those users happy... :-)
Comparing to other vendors is useful -- to a point. I'd rather see
us trying to make our systems better than they are, *and* better than
the competitors.
Much of what is "expected" in the PC space *stinks*, but I've come to
the realization that many PC users just don't recognize the odor. :-)
I'd rather see us learn from ourselves and for us to innovate, rather
than continuing to emulate the industry-standard rotten designs. This
means we (Digital) need to continue to collect requirements and
requests from the users, both external and internal, and to look at
what other Digital platforms -- UNIX and OpenVMS -- have done...
And when I think of things on a PC that are ripe for improvements and
areas for product differentiation, I keep coming up with "BIOS", and
with the generally poor low-level hardware-software integration. (One
seldom sees anything like the classic PC BIOS on the Macintosh, the
parameter RAM scheme is a far better design.) Part of this problem
undoubtedly involves Microsoft... But part is up to the vendor...
|
2236.6 | I agree, not htere yet, but better than last year | PCBUOA::FERRANTEV | | Fri Jan 31 1997 17:58 | 28 |
| I agree that MY ultimate PC is nothign like what we ship, or for that
matter what anyone else ships. If it was ever built, today's pricing
would make it way out of my reach and the same for most people.
If you have $100,000.00, I'm sure that any PC manufacturer would make
anything you wanted and it probably 'would even mow lawns'.
In order to be a player in the field you have to balance features,
price and performance. That isn't always as easy as it sounds. In the
past year, I believe that DEC has established itself as 'in the game'
and if we continue to provide the correct combination of the 3 and can
provide timely service, we should have no problems in the future. DEC
is finally getting good reviews in the magazines, yet to make Editor's
Choice, but favorable reviews. THe one thing that we have going for us
this time with MMX CPU's is that we are the ONLY one actually SHIPPING
units. Yep, nobody else is yet shipping. That's an advantage. Next
time, we get included in customers choices for a new model instead of
"Huh, DEC, do they make portables? NO I never saw them in any
magazine".
Positive suggestions are always welcome. I could go on for hours about
what is missing and ask why it isn't in there. I'd rather keep
specifying my IDEAL system and hoping that more and more of the
features I want start to show up. And all in the same system. It's
beginning to work, more neat stuff is coming. Wait until you see the
new products... That's all I can say.
Vin
|