| T.R | Title | User | Personal
Name | Date | Lines |
|---|
| 411.1 | | ECADSR::SHERMAN | Steve ECADSR::Sherman DTN 223-3326 MLO5-2/26a | Tue Oct 13 1992 11:57 | 3 |
| Yup. Connecticut. I *think* Hartford, but I am probably mistaken.
Steve (who can hardly wait!)
|
| 411.2 | | SOLVIT::ALLEN_R | Is there profit in this? | Tue Oct 13 1992 17:26 | 4 |
| yep, Conn. is what i heard. Hartford. probably a compromise location
for putting one in New England. Must have really hurt them to do it.
I detest going through MA for anything.
|
| 411.3 | | ECADSR::SHERMAN | Steve ECADSR::Sherman DTN 223-3326 MLO5-2/26a | Wed Oct 14 1992 09:07 | 6 |
| Can't decide how to respond to .2:
1. Ah, but doesn't MA look great in your rear view mirror?
2. Going through MA is no problem. It's having to stay ...
Steve
|
| 411.4 | | MIMS::ROLLINS_R | | Wed Oct 21 1992 13:19 | 2 |
| Three new temples were announced at conference: in Hong Kong,
in Utah county, and in Hartford, Connecticut.
|
| 411.5 | | BIGSOW::WILLIAMS | Bryan Williams | Fri Dec 04 1992 13:55 | 6 |
| Rich,
Drive out 101, through Vermont to Albany, take 87S, then cut over on 84. That
way you'll avoid Mass entirely. :-)
Bryan
|
| 411.6 | | SOLVIT::ALLEN_R | a short trip down from here | Fri Dec 04 1992 18:05 | 6 |
| yea, i love driving through VT, and northern NY, so I may just start
going to Toronto and skip the socialist countries to our south
altogether. ;)
To bad they didn't build one in Montreal. or ME. just how many
members are there in NYC anyway.
|