T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
249.1 | Behavior unacceptable | HSSWS1::BRUUN | | Tue Jun 06 1989 11:21 | 11 |
| Frankly, the most disappointing thing in this whole affair, is the
attitude, that the Administration is taking, I don't care what
strategic setback we will suffer, if we distance ourselve from China,
but I do know this, we should never directly or indirectly have
anything to do with a regime that kill it's own people by the tousands.
They need to get a lesson from the rest of the world, that that is a
totally unacceptable way to behave. In this day and age you can not
claim internal unrest and problems to be problems only to be dealt with
internally.
Peter
|
249.2 | I disagree, but only slightly, I think ... | MIZZOU::SHERMAN | ECADSR::SHERMAN 227-3299, 223-3326 | Tue Jun 06 1989 14:07 | 37 |
| Back in 1935, during the time of the Long March, the US backed the
Kuomintang (sp?) in chasing Mao and gang around the country. It
was to our embarrassment and shame that they treated the Communists
the way they did. The Communists were outnumbered and outgunned by
the American-supplied armies of the state. Many martyrs for the cause
were created. It was not hard for the Commmunists to convince the
people that the Americans were their enemy. I don't think the American
people were even aware of what was happening, so their true wishes
were not expressed.
But, today our response has, in my opinion, been good so far. I find it
interesting that for a while there was anti-American sentiment
expressed among the Chinese students, thinking that we were again
involved in the suppression of the people. But, our response this
time is showing our true colors. The word about Beijing has spread
throughout China, not because of the government-contolled sources
that downplay the issues, but because of Voice of America and other
English broadcasts as well as other sources. Seems many of the people
have been studying English and own radios. Unlike 1935, we are making
it very clear that we support the will of the people.
News now has it that the 27th regiment (the one that attacked the
students) of the PLA may be attacked by the 38th regiment. This
would herald civil war. A witness claimed that the members of the
27th regiment were simply murderers - slaying man, woman and child
without discression. This contrasts heavily with the good traditional
relations the people have had with the PLA. I can't help but wonder
about the soldiers on either side who are now torn between duty to
country and duty as soldiers.
What would you do if you were a good Christian soldier in the 27th
regiment? What would you do if you were a good Christian soldier in
the 38th regiment? If a clash ensues, there will be family members
on both sides. Would you have stronger allegiance to state, to
family or to other moral principles?
Steve
|
249.3 | | RIPPLE::KOTTERRI | Rich Kotter | Tue Jun 06 1989 17:04 | 13 |
| As I have considered the events of the last week, I am glad that LDS
missionaries are not presently in China. Consider the danger that they
could now be in, if this were the case. However, I also find myself
wondering if these events are part of the Lord's plan to prepare the
way for the gospel to be preached in China, sometime in the future.
In any case, I am deeply saddened by wicked rulers who hunger so
much for power that they would send their armies to attach unarmed
civilians who are peacefully demonstrating. I pray for God's blessing
to be with the Chinese people at this time.
In Christ's Love,
Rich
|
249.4 | Just Wondering | KIKETT::HAGUE_LO | AIM TO PLEASE | Tue Jun 06 1989 17:40 | 9 |
| But there are missionaries in China. As of this date, our former
Bishop Westland and his wife Sybil are serving in the Hong Kong
Mission. Are you speaking primarily of "youthful" missionaries?
Last time I checked they were still there and Hong Kong was part
of mainland China.
Louise
|
249.5 | | MILPND::PERM | Kevin R. Ossler | Tue Jun 06 1989 18:00 | 19 |
| RE: < Note 249.4 by KIKETT::HAGUE_LO >
Well, yes, Hong Kong is part of China, but it is still administered via
British authority; the gang in Beijing will not control things in Hong
Kong completely until the year 1997.
Which raises an interesting question: what will happen in 1997 when control
of Hong Kong reverts to China's authority? While various liberties now
enjoyed by the people of Hong Kong are supposed to be provided for in the
treaty that gives Hong Kong to the Beijing government, most such liberties
that I know of are in the economic category. What about religious
liberties?
I think I heard once that indeed there are members in Communist China, but
that open proselyting and building chapels was forbidden; the members there
must practise their religion quietly. Missionary work goes on, but it is
conducted by the members, and then only with their established acquaintances.
/kevin
|
249.6 | | MIZZOU::SHERMAN | ECADSR::SHERMAN 227-3299, 223-3326 | Wed Jun 07 1989 08:36 | 18 |
| The turnover in 1997 is probably one of the reasons that China has
been introducing democratic reforms. How else would they be able
to integrate Hong Kong back into the mainland without destroying
the economic strength of the sector? So, I think they were pretty
much forced to introduce capitalist ideas into their society.
The news reports I've seen indicate that Honk Kong is still being
used as an exit port for foreigners evacuating Beijing. Also, though
civil war is feared, violence has not yet become widespread though
there are a lot of troop movements. Americans are being pulled out of
Beijing, but are remaining in other portions of China. There has been
no mention yet of missionaries. But, from the looks of it, the
missionaries in Honk Kong are probably not thought to be in danger at
this time.
Steve
|
249.7 | Signs of the times. | CADM::MCKINNEY | Albatros! | Mon Jun 12 1989 14:00 | 17 |
|
It seems clear to me that the recent organization of the 2nd quorum
of the 70, and the problems in China (and elsewhere in the world)
all point to an expanded missionary effort in the future.
The Lord is clearly preparing the world for the rolling forth of
the gospel. The stone cut out of the mountains without hands spoken
of by Daniel the prophet will continue to roll forth until it has
filled the whole earth.
I think this is an exciting time to be on the earth!
Be that as it may, I sorrow for all of those innocent souls who
must live in a country where souldiers kill women and children with
impunity. I hope sanity is restored soon.
Jim
|
249.8 | just my opinion ... | MIZZOU::SHERMAN | ECADSR::SHERMAN 227-3299, 223-3326 | Mon Jun 12 1989 16:20 | 16 |
| Lately, the government in China seems to be wanting things to go
back to normal. However, there are some things that have permanently
changed. They can't go back on their economic reforms because they
can't afford it, having come to rely on the results of economic
reform. They can't continue to lie to the people as they are now
doing because of the many forms of information left available to
the people (particulary telephone and radio). They can't rely on
the good will of the people to support the Revolution and the PLA.
The ties that the people had with the Revolution and with the PLA
have been permanently tarnished. It would seem that a field is
being created that is extremely ripe to harvest. Temporarily, the
government will be able to destroy the ripened fruit and harvest
the tares, but as the season continues, the harvest will become too
large for the tares to thrive.
Steve
|
249.9 | | MIZZOU::SHERMAN | ECADSR::SHERMAN 227-3299, 223-3326 | Thu Jun 22 1989 12:17 | 9 |
| My wife (who just got back from visiting her folks with the kids)
told me that my three-year old saw a magazine with a picure of China
and of one of the students lying dead on the pavement. He asked her
if the man was hurt and she told him yes. She didn't think too
much of it until a few days later when my boy said the evening prayer
and asked the Lord to 'bless the Chinese and bless the man that
was hurt ...'
Steve
|
249.10 | This would also fit in the Pride note.... | JUPITR::HANSEN | Not Far From the Madding Crowd | Thu Jun 22 1989 13:08 | 24 |
| A couple of weeks ago, I used as the material for my lesson for
the Priests Quorum the talk delivered by President Benson on pride
(being discussed in note 245). One of the boys made a comment about
the situation in China and how it was the pride of the leaders there
that precipitated such a terrible outcome to a situation that had
so much potential for improvement and good. The leaders' lust for
power and control over the population would not let the people voice
their desires for a more democratic form of government; rather,
the leaders chose to kill innocent and unarmed citizens in order
to preserve their hold on the people. At present, it seems that
the leaders are set on crushing whatever may be left of the democratic
movement. Pride is a hard thing to give up (I heard once that when
we pray for countries to be opened to the gospel, we may actually
be praying for war, famine, disaster, etc.--I think pride is the
reason for this), but until those in high position are unburdened
of their pride (either voluntarily, or by compulsion), I don't think
we'll see much progress in China. The gospel will one day be spread
throughout China; however, if the Chinese government must be compelled
to be humble, there will be some ugly days before then.
I also pray for China and all those whose lives have been injured
through this ordeal.
Dave
|