| F.A.R.M.S. (See note 125.1) has the following in its "Nibley Archive".
**************************************************************************
More Voices from the Dust (1956) N-MOE $0.50
The Dead Sea Scrolls: Some Questions and Answers (1963) N-DEA 0.50
Qumran and the Companions of the Cave, or the haunted
Wilderness (1965) N-QUM 1.00
In addition, Nibley has discussed other records that have been discovered.
The Early Christian Church in the Light of Some Newly
Discovered Papyri from Egypt (1964) N-EAC 1.25
Dark Days in Jerusalem: The Lachish Letters and the
Book of Mormon (1982) N-DAR 0.75
|
| Tree of Life Productions (see note 125.9) has the following tapes by Einar
C. Erickson. I've heard some of the tapes, and Erickson is an impressive
speaker. However, I know nothing about his background and hence his
credibility to discuss these topics.
**************************************************************************
The Dead Sea Scrolls and the Mormon Church #50 $4.95
Discovery of the Dead Sea Scrolls 53 4.95
Doctrine & organization of the Dead Sea Scrolls and
the Restoration 78 4.95
Erickson has discussed other documents.
The discovery of the Nag-Hammadi Library 54 4.95
Nag-Hammadi discoveries and the Plan of Salvation 79 4.95
The Angel Raphael & recent discoveries - Part I
The Heavenly Mother & the discoveries at Nag-Hammadi
Part II 91 4.95
Great discoveries around the world that confirm the
Restoration 93 4.95
New discoveries that confirm the Pearl of Great Price 96 4.95
New and great discoveries of the Pseudepigrapha 97 4.95
Great discoveries that confirm the two newly added
Mormon scriptures 98 4.95
Ebla - The discovery of the kingdom and its royal
archives 100 4.95
Discoveries of the caves of the 1000 Buddhas 102 4.95
Doctrines of the Mandeans of Iran and Iraq and the
Restored Gospel 104 4.95
The discovery and recovery of ancient documents 113 4.95
The Heavenly Mother in ancient and present times 115 4.95
|
| My understanding, if you'll pardon the informality, is that Einar
Erickson is not very credible as an archaeologist. Basically, he
picks and chooses theories about the writings and interprets them with
a strong bias toward the Scriptures. It is interesting to hear the tapes,
and the points made could be valid. But, the processes used, resulting
conclusions and other claims made would not, in my opinion, hold up
well in a scientific forum.
Steve
|