T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
4336.1 | some info | IOSG::BILSBOROUGH | SWBFS | Mon Jul 11 1994 18:15 | 11 |
|
We had one of our internal field test sites run with this
configuration. It is not a MUST that it should be 3.3 but there are a
few problems with 3.2.
Someone else should be able to answer with more information.
ALL-IN-1 Client Services Access, does that mean using the Client Server
ALL-IN-1 licence?, just curious.
Mike
|
4336.2 | An SPD expression | VAXRIO::63011::ALCIDES | Alcides Rocha - SW specialist | Mon Jul 11 1994 21:00 | 9 |
|
>> ALL-IN-1 Client Services Access, does that mean using the Client Server
>> ALL-IN-1 licence?, just curious.
Yes. The expression "Client Services Access" appears in the SPD. It sounds
strange to me, too.
Thanks for the info.
|
4336.3 | ALL-IN-1 V3.1 and MR V3.2: possible, but not advised | IOSG::MARSHALL | A glitch in reality | Tue Jul 12 1994 11:45 | 12 |
| RE: ALL-IN-1 V3.1 and remote Message Router V3.2
Whereas ALL-IN-1 V3.1 will work most of the time with remote Message Router
V3.2, there are some significant problems which have been fixed in Message
Router V3.3A, which is why V3.3A is our minimum supported version.
There is nothing to stop you using remote Message Router V3.2, but this is an
unsupported configuration, so if you or the customer experience any problems,
you won't get official help with them (but the CSC are nice people so they may
try and help you on a "best effort" basis).
Scott
|
4336.4 | | CSOA1::LENNIG | Dave (N8JCX), MIG, @CYO | Tue Jul 12 1994 13:36 | 5 |
| The previous notes refer to using a remote Transfer Service.
Remote DDS access _only_ works with V3.3A
Dave
|