T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
4294.1 | Run TRM | IOSG::MAURICE | End of the road for the Emerald City | Mon Jun 27 1994 12:28 | 8 |
| Hi,
The TRM housekeeping job will fix up problems like this by creating a dummy
SDAF record. It will not delete the file.
Cheers
Stuart
|
4294.2 | Just an observation. | WAYOUT::CROOKS | | Tue Jun 28 1994 11:24 | 14 |
| Hi,
>>>SDAF record for file name: OA$SHARE333:ZVFFOWJ34.PS in Drawer:
>>> [FOLGADO]PSECTOR Folder: SPD Number: 000033 cannot be accessed by RMS.
Is this a mail message or a private document? Because its a tad
unusual to have a file type of .PS in an OA$SHARE* directory. It looks
like somebody has been playing with docdb pointers or the like.
regards
Alan
|
4294.3 | Not nowadays | IOSG::PYE | Graham - ALL-IN-1 Sorcerer's Apprentice | Tue Jun 28 1994 15:50 | 15 |
| Re .2
<<< Is this a mail message or a private document? Because its a tad
<<< unusual to have a file type of .PS in an OA$SHARE* directory.
A quick DIR through one of our shared area discs found 88 .PS files in
the directories.
With people on PCs using TL to file things in shared drawers, it's
probably quite common.
Graham
PS Also explains why we have no disc space left!
|
4294.4 | Corrupt SDAF file? | AIMTEC::FARLEY::PORTER_T | Terry Porter - Customer Support | Wed Jun 29 1994 18:45 | 22 |
| Could the SDAF file itself be corrupt? Try analysing it (ANAL/RMS) to see
if there are any errors, you will need ALL-IN-1 shut down to do this.
If you can not shut down ALL-IN-1 you could try reading the record with DCL
to see if that gives a more helpful message.
$ OPEN/READ/SHARE DAF OA$SHARE:OA$DAF_E.DAT
$ READ/KEY="OA$SHARE333:ZVFFOWJ34.PS" DAF REC
*** message here ***
$ CLOSE DAF
A record not found type error probably indicates that the record got
deleted a different error may give you a clue as to what is wrong.
Do the ANA/RMS if you can as this is more reliable and usually more
informative.
If you do have a corrupt RMS file the CSC has a tool (in the US at least
and I believe most other CSCs have the tool as well) that should be able to
fix it.
Terry
|
4294.5 | Not wishing to question the Sorcerer's word but..... | WAYOUT::CROOKS | | Thu Jun 30 1994 15:50 | 22 |
| Hi Graham
Re .3 Was that a deliberate rat-hole opportunity.....:-)
Because I still dont see how people refiling documents into
Shared Drawers is going to produce .PS files in a Shared Mail
Area. I'd be interested to know the keystrokes to create a
Shared Drawer that maps to something like
DSA63:[OA$SHARE.SHARE333]
You can certainly have .PS files in the Shared Mail Directories
but they will more than likely be attachments to mail from remote
locations, not the actual mail message itself. .0 refers to a mail
message's SDAF record.
>>>SDAF record for file name: OA$SHARE333:ZVFFOWJ34.PS in Drawer:
cheers
Alan
|
4294.6 | Extremely deep rathole! | IOSG::PYE | Graham - ALL-IN-1 Sorcerer's Apprentice | Thu Jun 30 1994 18:55 | 17 |
| Um, yes you're right, they are quite likely to be attachments.
Continuing the rathole, more deviously, I created a mail message, and
then tried to GOLD/Get a .PS file into it, but in V3.1, you can't do
that! So I next tried to create an ordinary message, and "U"pdate it to
PS, which doesn't work, and then I tried "CD"ing it, but that changes it
into a document.
Perhaps you can do it from the API? (I've tried MAIL MAIL_DOCUMENT, but
that doesn't work!)
You obviously need one of these funny PC thingies :-)
Graham (Definitely back in the apprentice class!)
PS Maybe .0's problem is that he has some attachments that have lost
their parents?
|
4294.7 | More ratholes... | IOSG::MARSHALL | A glitch in reality | Fri Jul 01 1994 11:20 | 26 |
| If you do MH on a Postscript document, it becomes a mail message. However, I
see nothing in the base note to imply the SDAF record is a top-level message
rather than an attachment...
ANALYSE/RMS is still probably the best thing to try.
Or maybe the FCR (what is FCR anyway?) documentation will tell you what "SPD
number 000033" means? (I know, I'm so na�ve :-)
To me, it simply sounds as though the SDAF record is missing. What happens if
you try and read the document? Do you get --TOP-- and --BOTTOM-- markers with
nothing between them, or do you get the "PostScript document type cannot be
displayed" message? What does SH reveal for these documents?
What does FCVR make of it all? If FCVR finds files with no SDAF records, it
will created dummy records, which enables the documents to be recovered. It
should be possible to fix things up without this happening:
>> any repair that I might attempt will probably delete the files
The other alternative is simply to DT the documents into ALL-IN-1 afresh.
This still leaves the question of why the SDAF records are missing. Are there
any suspect errors in the DAF error log file oa$log:OA$DAF_ERR.LOG? Are all the
file protections on these drawers correct?
Scott
|
4294.8 | | SIOG::T_REDMOND | Writing away on WWT2 | Fri Jul 01 1994 13:41 | 6 |
| FCR is the ALL-IN-1 File Cabinet Report. It's a PASS available from
ASSETS. I have no idea what SPD number 000033 means. But as I wrote
the program this isn't at all surprising -- the last time I set serious
hands on the code was late 1991!
Tony
|
4294.9 | Answer | SIOG::T_REDMOND | Writing away on WWT2 | Fri Jul 01 1994 13:47 | 18 |
| > SDAF record for file name: OA$SHARE333:ZVFFOWJ34.PS in Drawer:
> [FOLGADO]PSECTOR Folder: SPD Number: 000033 cannot be accessed by RMS.
I got curious and pulled out the source code... The message indicates
that a record from DOCDB.DAT is pointing to a file in the shared area
(OA$SHARE333:ZVFFOWJ34.PS). The file in in the [FOLGADO]PSECTOR drawer,
folder SPD, document number 33. For some reason or another the FCR
program wasn't able to read OA$SDAF_E.DAT to locate a record with key
value OA$SHARE333:ZVFFOWJ34.PS. It could be that the file is an
attachment, or the body of a mail message, but whatever happened, an
RMS error was signalled when the BASIC code attempted to read the SDAF
record. Maybe the SDAF is corrupt, maybe the code is flakey, maybe I
don't know.
It's hard to be more precise without being able to run the code in
DEBUG mode against the file cabinet....
Tony
|
4294.10 | Setting the Boys on me now eh GAP?:-) | WAYOUT::CROOKS | | Fri Jul 01 1994 13:57 | 19 |
| Hi Scott,
>>>If you do MH on a Postscript document, it becomes a mail message.
If you do MH and then look at SH the VMS filename is then,
not surprisingly for an UNSENT mail, [.MSG]Zmumble.WPL. I dont
think sending that will create a .PS in OA$SHARE*.
>>> However, I
>>>see nothing in the base note to imply the SDAF record is a top-level message
>>>rather than an attachment...
I guess I'll give you that one....:-)
cheers
Alan.
ps RUI Is any of this being of any use????....unlikely!
|
4294.11 | Isn't a useful rat-hole called a mink hole??!!! | IOSG::PYE | Graham - ALL-IN-1 Sorcerer's Apprentice | Fri Jul 01 1994 18:47 | 18 |
| Alan,
I tried doing an MH on a .PS file and I got a nice PS format file in a
.TXT file in the shared area. I guess it must do the conversion based
on our default editors. In V3.1, it's sufficiently smart (??) that it
sniffs the '!PS Adobe' at the front, and won;t let you read it, even
though it has a .TXT extension!
One of my colleagues in TeamLinks development (or at least our bit of
it) says that it's easy to create a .PS message and send it, but I
haven't seen it done yet.
But in answer to your PS (that's the original meaning of Post Script of
course :-) ) you ask is this of any use? Well I'd say that any
discussion and technical research like this can only help to increase
all our knowledge of the way the product works.
Graham
|