T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
4254.1 | | GIDDAY::SETHI | Better to ask a question than remain ignorant | Wed Jun 15 1994 04:07 | 7 |
| Hi All,
Does anyone know about this little problem ?
Thanks for your help in advance,
Sunil
|
4254.2 | | IOSG::TALLETT | Roll on Chicago... | Wed Jun 15 1994 11:10 | 6 |
|
Erm, TCP doesn't install on V2.4 as far as I am aware. Or have
you got hold of the very early version that never shipped?
Regards,
Paul
|
4254.3 | Oh yes it did | AIMTEC::WICKS_A | Atlanta's Most (In)famous Welshman | Wed Jun 15 1994 17:26 | 7 |
| Paul,
TCP v1.0 ONLY installed on v2.4 !1
Regards,
Andrew.D.Wicks
|
4254.4 | I was one of the few that worked on it too! | IOSG::TALLETT | Roll on Chicago... | Wed Jun 15 1994 22:18 | 13 |
|
You are right of course! And it was me that got the damn name
changed... :-)
I didn't think TCP V1.0 was supported...we just gave it to some
customers who beat us up.
Needless to say I don't have access to a TCP V1.0 system, maybe
try looking in the equivalent file in TLC V2.0/V2.1 or ALL-IN-1
V3.1, and you might find a fix (probably a STOP/ID if memory serves)
Regards,
Paul
|
4254.5 | Maybe this prob? | AIMTEC::WICKS_A | Atlanta's Most (In)famous Welshman | Thu Jun 16 1994 00:51 | 8 |
| now we've established that how about my mate Sunil takinga look at the
STARS article entitled
ALL-IN-1 Housekeeping Procedures Fail Without Apparent Reason
which I found by doing a search on "TCP"
Regards,
Andrew.D.wicks
|
4254.6 | Stars article does not help | GIDDAY::SETHI | Better to ask a question than remain ignorant | Thu Jun 16 1994 06:07 | 12 |
| Hi Andrew,
That Stars article would have been appropriate but the scenario is not
that same the customer does have the server entry in the
OA$DATA:OAFC_SERVER_MASTER.DAT.
Now that we have established that this product did really exist, is
there something else I can do ? I would be grateful for your help.
Regards,
Sunil
|