Title: | *OLD* ALL-IN-1 (tm) Support Conference |
Notice: | Closed - See Note 4331.l to move to IOSG::ALL-IN-1 |
Moderator: | IOSG::PYE |
Created: | Thu Jan 30 1992 |
Last Modified: | Tue Jan 23 1996 |
Last Successful Update: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
Number of topics: | 4343 |
Total number of notes: | 18308 |
ALL-IN-1 3.0A, OVMS 5.5-2 i'd like to chalk this up to user error as neither i nor the user can duplicate it. user selected her OUTBOX, refiled all 115 messages to folder call test. selected all 115 messaged in folder TEST. did XS. she swears she did not get the TO: screen. she did get a dialoge box saying that XS could not be used on UNSENT messages. but this didn't show up til message 110. it seems that the messages were resent to their original distributions. i know this because I received my fair share of them. upgrading in minnesota, ann
T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
4232.1 | IOSG::MAURICE | Six Programmers in search of an analyst | Sat Jun 04 1994 20:47 | 7 | |
Hi, Perhaps the user did an MCF!? Cheers Stuart | |||||
4232.2 | They must have used XMCD rather than XRFD | IOSG::COTTINGHAM | Mon Jun 06 1994 10:47 | 15 | |
I think they must have used MCD rather than RFD. I think this is expected behaviour for MCD. I use it all the time when testing. IO, ALL, XMCD CREATED, IC, ALL keeps sending the same messages. If you copy a SENT message it becomes UNSENT rather than COPIED and thus can be re-sent using XS or S. I believe it is assumed that if you are the author of a Mail message then it will assume UNSENT status when copied. I am sure this has been discussed before but I will leave it to the more knowlegable to explain the logic used. Regards Alan |