Title: | *OLD* ALL-IN-1 (tm) Support Conference |
Notice: | Closed - See Note 4331.l to move to IOSG::ALL-IN-1 |
Moderator: | IOSG::PYE |
Created: | Thu Jan 30 1992 |
Last Modified: | Tue Jan 23 1996 |
Last Successful Update: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
Number of topics: | 4343 |
Total number of notes: | 18308 |
I have a customer who wants to do some clean up with their ALL-IN-1 system. One of his options is to use the ALL-IN-1 Archiving feature to reduce the number of old files and messages on the system. He is a little leary about this because he has been led to believe that the Archiving Subsystem is not very robust --- Is this a valid concern? His second option is to do a backup of the system, delete messages and files older than a certain date, then Reorg/Repair the SDAF's and PDAF's. He feels that he can retrieve an old document (if necessary) by doing searchs on the XXXXXXXX.WPL's for a specific keyword. (Pretty scary...but he is serious). His third option is to introduce TeamLinks and have the users UNSHARE mail messages and place them on their local PC hard drives. (I like this because it sells Teamlinks Licences) To me, Option 1 seems to be the most straightforward, but not being an Archiving user, I don't know much about the concerns people have with the subsystem. Can anyone give me any ammunition to convince him that Archiving is the way to go. I think his doubts about the Archiving Subsystem are based upon the original version. Has their been any significant improvments since its inception. Any help would be appreciated. Thanks Mike Trotti
T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
4096.1 | OK, I'll (belatedly) bite | IOSG::PYE | Graham - ALL-IN-1 Sorcerer's Apprentice | Fri May 06 1994 17:31 | 11 |
I think our position now is that Archiving is reasonably robust. However, it may not be as efficient as saving space as he wouldlike, since its design model is more as a security type of archiving rather than a space saving one. It would probably be better to get him to run something like the Mail Janitor ASSETT to delete old messages from ALL-IN-1. If he wants to simply delete them at DCL, then you *only* have to run FCVR afterwards... Graham |