| Title: | *OLD* ALL-IN-1 (tm) Support Conference |
| Notice: | Closed - See Note 4331.l to move to IOSG::ALL-IN-1 |
| Moderator: | IOSG::PYE |
| Created: | Thu Jan 30 1992 |
| Last Modified: | Tue Jan 23 1996 |
| Last Successful Update: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
| Number of topics: | 4343 |
| Total number of notes: | 18308 |
On a large timesharing cluster with ALL-IN-1 V3.0, one ALL-IN-1 account has "randomly" renamed the subject you see when doing an index to be the same subject for a whole group of documents - regardless of what the document's subject really is. This seems to have only effected 2 of the user's folders. Example: No. Folder Title Author Modified Status 4 RESPONSES I: Product complexity 10-Feb-1994 READ 5 RESPONSES ELI 'S ASSESSMENT 09-Feb-1994 READ 6 RESPONSES RE: FWD: Eli on 09-Feb-1994 READ 7 RESPONSES "STRICTLY CONFIDENTIAL" 09-Feb-1994 READ 8 RESPONSES "STRICTLY CONFIDENTIAL" 09-Feb-1994 READ 9 RESPONSES "STRICTLY CONFIDENTIAL" 08-Feb-1994 READ 10 RESPONSES "STRICTLY CONFIDENTIAL" 08-Feb-1994 READ 11 RESPONSES "STRICTLY CONFIDENTIAL" 08-Feb-1994 READ 12 RESPONSES "STRICTLY CONFIDENTIAL" 07-Feb-1994 READ 13 RESPONSES "STRICTLY CONFIDENTIAL" 08-Feb-1994 READ 14 RESPONSES "STRICTLY CONFIDENTIAL" 07-Feb-1994 READ Above the subject "STRICTLY CONFIDENTIAL" was given to a group of documents although if you read the document you can get the correct subject which is something other than "STRICTLY CONFIDENTIAL". These documents had been safely in the RESPONSES folder for a few days before the subjects suddenly changed when doing an index. It has been about 2 weeks and the problem doesn't seem to have resurfaced, but does anyone know of a way to get the index to display the correct subject line for the documents which were affected? Thanks.
| T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4020.1 | Sounds like user error! | IOSG::MARSHALL | A glitch in reality | Thu Mar 24 1994 09:33 | 8 |
It sounds like a user-level action or customisation (eg UDP) has changed the values of the TITLE DCODB field, but left the DAF SUBJECT and DTITLE fields alone. Have they done U (Update Index Information) on some documents, for example, and accidentally put the wrong value in the title field? Scott | |||||
| 4020.2 | Still same problem -better problem description | MROA::BONVALLAT | Fri May 27 1994 17:58 | 28 | |
The problem described in this base note still occurs from time to time, and now I am going to rewrite a better description of the problem here: On a large timesharing cluster with ALL-IN-1 V3.0, for one particular user, when a number of mail messages get crossfiled from folder READ to new folder FYI with the XFD command, the following occurs... First...An Index of the new FYI folder shows all Titles are correct. Then usually about a day or two later, ALL-IN-1 appears to "randomly" rename the title which you see when doing an index to be the same for a whole group of documents - regardless of what the document's subject really is. This seems to only effect the newly created folder(s) which recently had many messages XFD'd to it (them). No problems have appeared when using XRFD. For Example - "STRICTLY CONFIDENTIAL" is not really the Title of these docs: No. Folder Title Author Modified Status 4 FYI I: Product complexity 10-Feb-1994 READ 5 FYI ELI 'S ASSESSMENT 09-Feb-1994 READ 6 FYI RE: FWD: Eli on 09-Feb-1994 READ 7 FYI "STRICTLY CONFIDENTIAL" 09-Feb-1994 READ 8 FYI "STRICTLY CONFIDENTIAL" 09-Feb-1994 READ 9 FYI "STRICTLY CONFIDENTIAL" 08-Feb-1994 READ 10 FYI "STRICTLY CONFIDENTIAL" 08-Feb-1994 READ 11 FYI "STRICTLY CONFIDENTIAL" 08-Feb-1994 READ 12 FYI "STRICTLY CONFIDENTIAL" 07-Feb-1994 READ Thanks for pondering this. - Jeff | |||||