| T.R | Title | User | Personal
Name | Date | Lines |
|---|
| 3993.1 | Why? are you sure this is what you want? | AIMTEC::WICKS_A | Atlanta's Most (In)famous Welshman | Thu Mar 17 1994 00:45 | 25 |
| henry,
long time no hear how's the fetcher going? (:==:) we're still waiting
for the beer to arrive - hint.
why doesn't the customer want System Distribution Lists in the profile?
well technically speaking they're not there as the profile entries just
point out to OA$SYSTEM_LISTS anyway.
I'm not sure what benefit you'd get by intercepting OA$MAIL_ALL_DIST
(I changed the note title to reflect the correct name of one of my
favourite DSABs) since you'd have potential knock on problems from
things that might depend on it such as the EM or TM subsystems and
particularly the dreaded OA$MAIL_ADD_ADDR dsab!!!!!!!!!
Is there a way that you can achieve what you want without having to
do a dsab? custom dsabs are fine if you have enough time and money but
ones that go near the mail code well it just makes me shiver.
... and i'm sure the thought of custom mail code will make Scott shiver
too if he's in in the morning!....
Regards,
Andrew.D.Wicks
|
| 3993.2 | If they're not there, Why look? | DPDMAI::REINDL | | Thu Mar 17 1994 17:59 | 18 |
|
The mail code is working great. We're back to normal (whatever that
is?) And the beer is forthcoming.
Our "favorite" customer knows that the profile just points to
OA$SYSTEM_LISTS so questions why we have to even bother looking in the
profile. With the current and growing number of ALL-IN-1 users
and the soon to be TeamLinks users, and many distribution lists, we're
trying to cut some of the I/O contention on the profile.
Does that make sense??
If there's another way to do that I'm all ears...
Henry
|