T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
3962.1 | Some more investigations (IPMT Time?) | VNABRW::EHRLICH_K | Still, I'm sad ... | Fri Mar 18 1994 13:14 | 60 |
| Hi,
today I've played around this problem:
Transfering a user from one MUPA system to another MUPA system works
fine, but an important field "FROM_ADDRESS" is missing in the mails.
I've checked all archivefiles for the field on both systems
(sending/receiving) all are filled in correct.
See details below.
I think that the problem is 100% in TRANSFER_RESTORE function. But this
I can't influence. If I'm right should I IPMT this bug???
Best regards
Charly_from_CSC_Vienna_hating_to_report_bugs...
User OFFICE from Node TROJA (V3.0A) to Node VNOTSC (V3.0A)
part of OFFICE1232000004.ARCHIVE;1
!*
!* ALL-IN-1 V3.0 Transfer File
!*
!* Start of main document
FILENAME OA$SHARE1:ZVDEHV06Z.WPL
TRANSFER$AREA:OFFICE1232000004.ARCHIVE_BODY
DR NO
RR NO
PRIORITY EXPRESS
FORWARDABLE YES
TO office @a1 @troja
SUBJECT test auf die troja
FROM_ADDRESS EHRLICH@A1@VNOTSC
FROM_DEPT CSC
The orignal mail on TROJA looks like (SH Show header)
Subject: test auf die troja
Title: test auf die troja
Sender: EHRLICH@A1@VNOTSC
Senders Full Name: Karl Ehrlich
Senders Tel No: 86630/2581
---> And after CSN to VNOTSC the mail looks like
Subject: test auf die troja
Title: test auf die troja
Sender:
Senders Full Name: Karl Ehrlich
Senders Tel No: 86630/2581
See the Senderfield (FROM_ADDRESS) is empty! Terrible if user wants to
reply !!!
|
3962.3 | Fixed in PFR | IOSG::MARSHALL | A glitch in reality | Fri Mar 18 1994 14:23 | 9 |
| This problem occurs because FROM_ADDRESS is a protected field -
only certain parts of the filecab code, doing certain operations, are allowed
to modify it. This is to prevent users changing the FROM_ADDRESS in mail
messages (and hence sending anonymous mail).
The transfer code therefore needs to take special action when writing
FROM_ADDRESS; at the moment (V3.0) it doesn't. I believe it's fixed in a PFR.
Scott
|
3962.4 | Oh! Good ... | VNABRW::EHRLICH_K | Still, I'm sad ... | Fri Mar 18 1994 15:01 | 16 |
| Hi Scott,
...fixed in a PFR. You know who the customer is, it's the CoV.
They're doing also the FT of the PFR. I hope it's really fixed.
By the way -> CoV transfers the user from MUPA to V2.4 system (no
TRANSFER_RESTORE function) and then from V2.4 to the other MUPA system.
This is only a 'wurg' around. They're transfering a lot of users now.
Your solution is hardcoded, if I'm right. So, If I'll escalate this through
normal channels may we get hold of the fix (I think about an ICF)
Scott, what's your idea?
Best regards and have a nice weekend!
Charly
|
3962.5 | Ask support gourp directly about ICFs | IOSG::MARSHALL | A glitch in reality | Mon Mar 21 1994 10:09 | 8 |
| >> If I'll escalate this through normal channels may we get hold of the fix
>> (I think about an ICF)
As V3.1 is now in EFT, I don't know how much longer the support group will
be making patches for V3.0. You'll have to ask them directly, as you say,
through the "normal channels" (whatever they are this week!)
Scott
|
3962.6 | Solved in PFR, but IPMTd today! | VNABRW::EHRLICH_K | Still, I'm sad ... | Fri Apr 01 1994 08:26 | 9 |
| Good morning Scott,
yes, you're right. It's solved in the PFR. We've tested this.
But we need the solution in the actual version. So I'll IPMT this
today through normal channels.
Happy Easter!
Charly
|
3962.7 | Fixed in ICF #37! | VNABRW::EHRLICH_K | Feeling like a CrashTestDummy! | Tue Jun 07 1994 08:16 | 1 |
|
|