T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
3923.1 | Well known difference in fnality between different products. | IOSG::MARSHALL | When you've got a widget, you don't need gimmicks | Mon Feb 28 1994 11:47 | 30 |
| Hi,
It's not that ALL-IN-1 isn't behaving, it just uses a different model of
bodypart handling.
When you forward a document, it is sent as an attachment. Message Router (and
X.400, and everything else) don't allow there not to be a main message for this
attachment, so if you don't add a cover note, ALL-IN-1 adds an empty one on
your behalf.
When you read this normally, you see the mail header (Interoffice Memorandum, a
list of TOs, CCs, etc), then there is no text above the "--ATTACHMENT--" line.
If it is sent to something that doesn't display the mail header, it will print
the empty main message, which comes out as a blank page.
The reason this doesn't happen in DECMailworks is that they don't encode
documents as attachments, but as multiple bodyparts of the main message. This
means they don't need an empty cover note for the main message, as the first
attachment effectively becomes the main message.
ALL-IN-1 doesn't use multiple bodyparts per header as it would regress existing
ALL-IN-1 functionality to do so.
They way to send a document in ALL-IN-1 without needing a cover note is instead
of using the Send or Forward options to send it, first use the MH option, which
automatically converts it to a mail message. Then add addressees, etc, and
Send as normal.
Scott
|
3923.2 | Any way to tell from vanilla ALL-IN-1 ? | COPCLU::COPLE4::GLARGAARD | Allan Glargaard, DS @DMO | Mon Feb 28 1994 12:39 | 16 |
| Scott, thanks for your good explanation of why this happens. I knew
it had something to do with backward compatibility in ALL-IN-1 :-)
The good DECfax engineering people have tried different ways of
detecting this empty cover letter, but have not yet found a reliable
way.
So far we have two workarounds, yours requires user interaction and
the other involves a special "Send via FAX" option on the WP menu.
If you know of a reliable way to find out if a message from vanilla
ALL-IN-1 contains an empty cover letter, please let me know and I'll
be happy to relay it to DECfax land.
Best regards,
Allan
|
3923.3 | One way... | IOSG::MARSHALL | When you've got a widget, you don't need gimmicks | Mon Feb 28 1994 15:08 | 7 |
| >> If you know of a reliable way to find out if a message from vanilla
>> ALL-IN-1 contains an empty cover letter
Do some kind of "Print to file" type operation and see if there are any
printable characters in the file. Crude but effective...
Scott
|
3923.4 | Print to file and test if F$FILE( ,"EOF") = 0? | IOSG::PYE | Graham - ALL-IN-1 Sorcerer's Apprentice | Tue Mar 15 1994 14:53 | 0 |
3923.5 | Well, maybe, but dont I need ... | COPCLU::COPLE4::GLARGAARD | Allan Glargaard, DS @DMO | Wed Mar 16 1994 09:33 | 17 |
| > -< Print to file and test if F$FILE( ,"EOF") = 0? >-
Wouldn't I need a special set of .PRA/.PRC files without any
setup strings in them? Else I would get the "printer" setup string
in the file.
Anyway, our users have been adviced that they should always send a
cover letter, or else ... :-)
I'll see if the guy who wrote a DOS viewer for .WPL files can make a
program that can check if the document only contains ruler
information and no text at all.
Thanks y'all for your suggestions,
best regards,
Allan
|
3923.6 | | AUSSIE::GARSON | achtentachtig kacheltjes | Thu May 19 1994 03:09 | 7 |
| re .*
A simple way to solve this problem is that if an empty cover letter is
to be sent then it should be a TEXT file rather than a WPS-PLUS file.
Granted that I don't know the full implications of that but I can't see
that the user would see much difference and we (DECfax Mail) could
certainly detect an empty text file.
|