Title: | *OLD* ALL-IN-1 (tm) Support Conference |
Notice: | Closed - See Note 4331.l to move to IOSG::ALL-IN-1 |
Moderator: | IOSG::PYE |
Created: | Thu Jan 30 1992 |
Last Modified: | Tue Jan 23 1996 |
Last Successful Update: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
Number of topics: | 4343 |
Total number of notes: | 18308 |
Hi, I have a customer who isn't able to select a Distribution List .. He receives no error but when the operation ends the first distribution list is still the one selected despite of his selection had been other distribution list. This happen with MDL option and with the users DL option too. I checked and the forms called are DLSYS (in the case of MDL option) and DL (DL option) ... Following the trace, I realized that in the "CHECK_DL" option there are three lines : ;;~~CHECK_DL~~;; { in the DLSYS form named data } get $distfolder = oa$_dlsys_folder \ mail dist_del $distname if oa$status == 0 then oa$msg_purge \\ XOP "~~find_first_sysdl~~" The correct distribution list is not selected because OA$STATUS is always 0 ... The same happens with the DL form ... I customized this form taking this line out and it worked .. but I can't understand why this happens .. I have other customers with the same version (3.0 Brazilian) and they don't have this problem. Any ideas of what can be causing this wrong status ? thks ... Marcia
T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
3828.1 | Duplicate names? | IOSG::MAURICE | I left my heart in Alcatraz | Fri Jan 28 1994 13:23 | 9 |
Hi, Does the user by any chance have a Private Distribution List with the same name as a System Distribution List? This would cause the symptom you are seeing. Cheers Stuart | |||||
3828.2 | info | VAXRIO::ABREU | Fri Jan 28 1994 17:00 | 13 | |
Hi Stuart , I made a test in the Manager account for example and I didn't have any private DL ... I created one .. and the same happened .. The distribution list have different names for sure. It's true that the names of the system lists are similar but we don't have how to avoid it because the name is composed by the departemnt , followed by numbers. Anyway , Do you see any problems in not test the status after the "mail dist_sel" function ? Do you think this similar names can be the cause of the problem? Thanks.. Marcia | |||||
3828.3 | Known problem | IOSG::MAURICE | I left my heart in Alcatraz | Fri Jan 28 1994 17:37 | 10 |
Hi, I looked at the code for the PFR and found that we have fixed a problem where the function MAIL DIST_SEL sets OA$STATUS to 0 if it has selected a System Distribution List. So I agree with your temporary workround of removing the test of oa$status. Cheers Stuart |