[Search for users] [Overall Top Noters] [List of all Conferences] [Download this site]

Conference iosg::all-in-1_v30

Title:*OLD* ALL-IN-1 (tm) Support Conference
Notice:Closed - See Note 4331.l to move to IOSG::ALL-IN-1
Moderator:IOSG::PYE
Created:Thu Jan 30 1992
Last Modified:Tue Jan 23 1996
Last Successful Update:Fri Jun 06 1997
Number of topics:4343
Total number of notes:18308

3767.0. "DECnet OSI and %OAFC-E-SRVPVNOTSUPPORT" by ZUR01::TOLBA () Mon Jan 17 1994 16:31

Hello,

A customer went to DECnet OSI V5.6b over Christmas. Afterwards he found some 
troubles with a satelite and FCS connections.

Configuration:   Bootnode = ITRZ02   ALL-IN-1 V3.0-1 
		 FCS:       ITRZ02$SRV73

		 Satelite = ITWS11  (no FCS on ITWS11)


Under DECnet Phase IV the satelite had no problems to make File Cabinet Server
connections. The user started ALL-IN-1 from ITWS11 and could use the 
ITRZ02$SRV73 FCS without any troubles.

With the introduction of DECnet OSI the user from ITWS11 gets the error 
message: %OAFC-I-SRVNOTAVAIL when she tries to do a FCS operation.

In the OAFC$SERVER.LOG there is the following error message:
Error: %OAFC-E-SRVPVNOTSUPPORT, the local or remote server does not
support this higher version protocol Message: SrvConnectProcess; 
the network partner is running higher version.

On the satelite ITWS11 we tried to create a Server  ITWS11$SRV73: 
The creation of the server did not finish. The ITWS11$SERVER73.DAT;1 
and the entry in OAFC_SERVER_MASTER.DAT;1 were created - but there 
could not be created object 73 in NCP.


On Bootnode ITRZ02 object 73 looks like:

NCL>show node itrz02 sess control applic 73 all

Node itrz02 Session Control Application 73
at 1994-01-13-15:06:18.989+01:00Iinf
...
    Outgoing Proxy                    = True
    Incoming Proxy                    = True
    Outgoing Alias                    = True
    Incoming Alias                    = True
    Node Synonym                      = False
    Image Name                        = <Default value>
    User Name                         = <Default value>
    Incoming OSI TSEL  		      = <Default value>


Could somebody please tell me if the NCL entry for object 73 has to be 
redefined?

Any other suggestions?

Thanks and regards,
Manuela
T.RTitleUserPersonal
Name
DateLines
3767.1One of these?AIMTEC::WICKS_AAtlanta&#039;s Most (In)famous WelshmanMon Jan 17 1994 17:3115
    Manuela,
    
    two things spring to mind as I sit here typing from my ice-bound cave.
    
    1) is this the DECnet Phase V Wave 2 thing - remember ALL-IN-1 only
       supports Wave 1.
    2) the higher version protocol message means you have a MUPA File Cab
       Server talking to a pre-MUPA File Cab server. somewhere in the MUP
       release notes it says you have run them all at the same revison
    level.
    
    Regards,
    
    Andrew.D.Wicks
    
3767.2DECnet OSI WAVE 3 / only one FCSZUR01::TOLBAWed Jan 19 1994 08:2613
Hello Andrew,

1)	It is DECnet OSI V5.6b and so it should be WAVE 3

2)	They have only one FCS on the Bootnode. The satelite does not
	have its own FCS  (according to customer it was running like
	this).
	
	It is ALL-IN-1 V3.0-1. MUPA will be installed approx. mid February.


Thanks and regards,
Manuela
3767.3Don't knowAIMTEC::WICKS_AAtlanta&#039;s Most (In)famous WelshmanWed Jan 19 1994 15:479
    Manuela,
    
    OK i'm lost then since I don't have anything to hand running WAVE 3
    is this supported by ALL-IN-1? would anyone in IOSg like to comment 
    on this configuration.
    
    Regards,
    
    Andrew.D.wicks
3767.4DECnet/OSI 5.6b disables filecabinet server !BACHUS::DBC030::VerbraekenLuctor et EmergoFri Feb 25 1994 10:3146
Customer has ALL-IN-1 version 3.0 pbl123a.

After upgrading his decnet phase V from wave 1 to wave 3.
He is unable to start his Filecabinet server !

the message he gets is :

<< Invalid Authentication information received by the
<< file cabinet server.


After looking thru some notes , the only info found
was how the sess control applic 73 needs to look like.
even after recreating the server definition from scratch
the problem remained.

So can iosg make a statement here ?

what is needed for ALL-IN-1 and DECnet/OSI 5.6b to be able
to use the FileCabinetServer ?



Customers definition looks like this:

NCL>show node xxx sess control applic 73 all

Node xxx Session Control Application 73
...
    Outgoing Proxy                    = True
    Incoming Proxy                    = True
    Outgoing Alias                    = True
    Incoming Alias                    = True
    Node Synonym                      = False
    Image Name                        = <Default value>
    User Name                         = <Default value>
    Incoming OSI TSEL                 = <Default value>



regards,

Luc Verbraeken


3767.5DECnet/osi 5.6b and FCS to they work together ?BACHUS::DBC030::VerbraekenLuctor et EmergoThu Mar 03 1994 10:3348
[continuation from 3767.4]

Customer has ALL-IN-1 version 3.0 pbl123a.

After upgrading his decnet phase V from wave 1 to wave 3.
He is unable to start his Filecabinet server !

the message he gets is :

<< Invalid Authentication information received by the
<< file cabinet server.


After looking thru some notes , the only info found
was how the sess control applic 73 needs to look like.
even after recreating the server definition from scratch
the problem remained.

So can iosg make a statement here ?

what is needed for ALL-IN-1 and DECnet/OSI 5.6b to be able
to use the FileCabinetServer ?



Customers definition looks like this:

NCL>show node xxx sess control applic 73 all

Node xxx Session Control Application 73
...
    Outgoing Proxy                    = True
    Incoming Proxy                    = True
    Outgoing Alias                    = True
    Incoming Alias                    = True
    Node Synonym                      = False
    Image Name                        = <Default value>
    User Name                         = <Default value>
    Incoming OSI TSEL                 = <Default value>



regards,

Luc Verbraeken



3767.6Good luck note moved backAIMTEC::WICKS_AAtlanta&#039;s Most (In)famous WelshmanThu Mar 03 1994 15:1612
    Luc,
    
    If you want IOSG to make a statement then you probably need to go the
    official route and send mail to Dave Holt @REO. I have been unable to
    locate anyone prepared to say anything about Wave 3 so I wish you luck.
    
    I will though in my role as co-moderator move this note and your base
    note back to the original note.
    
    Regards,
    
    Andrew.D.Wicks
3767.7This has been IPMT'ed by product management.BACHUS::DBC030::VerbraekenLuctor et EmergoMon Mar 07 1994 17:0421
This is Dave Holt response to my mail asking him
about ALL-IN-1 3.0 and DECnet/osi 5.6B

--------------
Luc,

The existing IPMT number for this is CFS.9029, Severity 3. The Exception 
Mgr is Peter Meinerz (865-4091) and Technical mgr rene Bruederli 
(760-2513). 

Regards,
Dave
----------------

By the way:
I think we found a solution, as soon it is tested and ok given by 
Mr.customer ,I'll post the bypass here.

luc verbraeken
csc brussels

3767.8customise the oafc$server_startup.scp !BACHUS::DBC030::VerbraekenLuctor et EmergoTue Mar 08 1994 10:5018
Mark Vankerkhove provided us the following fix:


customize the oafc$server_startup.scp

!
!add those lines just before the .label server_running line
!
get oa$display="waiting to set session control application ..."\force
get oa$dcl="Wait 0 00:00:30"
clear
get oa$dcl="mc ncl set session control applic 73 outgoing alias false"
!


regards,
Luc Verbraeken

3767.9ZUR01::KURTHPeter Kurth @RLE, R�mlang (Switzerland)Fri Mar 11 1994 10:4451
	Hi

	I'm actually the originator (creator) of this IPMT CFS.9029 (see
	also note 3833).
	
	I will informed you as soon as I get an answer from engineering.

	I use a similar workaround (see below) as Luc's, this works
	fine on two systems on my customer's site.

	Regards, Peter

$!------------------------------------------------------------------------
$! DEC Digital Equipment Corporation AG, R�mlang
$! Enduser Services, P. Kurth
$! Use:	Fixes problem (as a workaround) with non responding File Cabinet
$!	Server when Outgoing Alias is Enabled (after upgrading to
$!	DECnet/OSI V5.6B).
$! Run:	Edit SYS$STARTUP:OAFC$STARTUP.COM and add one line:
$!	     $! Server started, tidy up and exit.
$!	     $  CLOSE/NOLOG write_mbx
$!	     $  CLOSE/NOLOG read_mbx
$!	     $  @SYS$STARTUP:OAFC$MODIFY_OBJECT73.COM
$!	     $  EXIT 1
$!
$!------------------------------------------------------------------------
$
$	Counter = 0
$	ws = "write sys$output"
$
$ Object_Search:
$	Counter = Counter + 1
$	IF Counter .GT. 15 THEN GOTO Object_Missing
$	mc ncl show session control application 73
$	if $status
$	then
$	  ws "Setting Outgoing Alias False ...""
$	  mc ncl set session control application 73 Outgoing Alias False
$	  goto Object_OK
$	else
$	  ws "Object 73 is missing. Trying again ..."
$	  wait 00:00:10
$	  goto Object_Search
$	endif
$
$ Object_OK:
$	exit
$
$ Object_Missing:
$	ws "Error: Could not found Object 73! Searched ''Counter' times."
$	exit
3767.10Addition to workaround ...ZUR01::KURTHPeter Kurth @RLE, R�mlang (Switzerland)Mon Mar 14 1994 13:188
	Hi

	Today I discovered a small problem and fixed it like:

	Add the identifier NET$MANAGE to the ALLIN1 account in order to
	allow ALLIN1 to modify the NCL application 73.

	Regards, Peter
3767.11each workstation needs his server defined ???BACHUS::DBC030::VerbraekenLuctor et EmergoMon Mar 14 1994 15:4012
Another question I'm having but which is related to
the fact that DECnet/osi 5.6B and ALL-IN-1 3.0 are being used:


When ALL-IN-1 is used from a workstation, there was previously
NO need to run a server on that station.
NOW  you do need to define a server for each workstation who
wishes to use shared file cabinet services ?

Has someone bypassed this situation , let us know ?


3767.12Define OAFC$SRV_NODE on your workstationZUR01::TOLBATue Mar 15 1994 10:2711
    Hello Luc,
    
    The solution to my problem see .0 was to define on the satelite
    workstation the logical OAFC$SRV_Node with the value of the node where
    the FCS runs.
    
    In my customer's configuration we had to define OAFC$SRV_Node with
    ITRZ02 where ITRZ02 is the bootnode.
    
    Regards,
    Manuela
3767.13re .5: Fixed in V3.1ZUR01::KURTHPeter Kurth @RLE, R�mlang (Switzerland)Tue Jul 12 1994 16:307
	Hello

	re .5: The problem with "Invalid Authentication information
	received by the file cabinet server." is fixed in ALL-IN-1 IOS
	V3.1 (ICO#1950). For V3.0, use the workaround from 3767.8 or 3767.9.

	Regards, Peter