T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
3687.1 | Cross-posted from ABBOTT::WINDOWS_OFFICE?? | AIMTEC::WICKS_A | WC94 Dream died when Bodin missed | Tue Dec 21 1993 16:11 | 13 |
| Randy,
Of course the TLC hasn't actually shipped yet .... (:==:) I assume
that you are going on either the SPD or some note over in the TeamLinks
conference where they seem to discuss this a bit - I assume you have
tried searching that conference?
Oh I see you posted note 3124.2 in that conference and cross-posted
that note here - wouldn't it be better to keep the discussion there?.
regards,
Andrew.D.Wicks
|
3687.2 | Another good reason not to use IOSG diskspace | AIMTEC::WICKS_A | WC94 Dream died when Bodin missed | Tue Dec 21 1993 16:35 | 6 |
| see notes 2594.10 and 3171.9 in the TeamLinks conf where the IOSG developers
have already asked this question.
regards,
Andrew.D.wicks
|
3687.3 | | DV780::BAILEYR | OICU812! | Tue Dec 21 1993 17:04 | 19 |
| re: .1
>Oh I see you posted note 3124.2 in that conference and cross-posted
>that note here - wouldn't it be better to keep the discussion there?
Well, what about the MacIntosh users who might also be affected by
this? Seemed to me that this conference was "common" to both clients,
especially when IOS will be the server.
re: .2
>see notes 2594.10 and 3171.9 in the TeamLinks conf where the IOSG developers
>have already asked this question.
fm .0
>Realizing this is an unsupported configuration (presently), has anyone
>made the TLC v2.0 work with TGV's Multinet? If so, what was involved?
These notes don't indicate what was involved, though!
RLB
|
3687.4 | another pointer | AIMTEC::WICKS_A | WC94 Dream died when Bodin missed | Wed Dec 22 1993 20:54 | 8 |
| Randy,
OK well what about Paul Marchant's answer to note 3690 that seems very
definitive.
regards,
Andrew.D.Wicks
|
3687.5 | Maybe, maybe not. | IOSG::MARCHANT | I'd sink therefore I swam | Wed Dec 22 1993 23:43 | 13 |
| Andrew,
Randy already knows that it's unsupported (re-read .0 and/or look at
this note's title.)
As to whether it would work, depends on how good Multinet's UCX emulation
at the $QIO level is. Note also, that the TLC installation and the System
Management use the `UCX' DCL verb for some tasks.
Cheers,
Paul.
P.S. this is my final word on TCP/IP support for this year - I'm now on
holiday!
|