[Search for users] [Overall Top Noters] [List of all Conferences] [Download this site]

Conference iosg::all-in-1_v30

Title:*OLD* ALL-IN-1 (tm) Support Conference
Notice:Closed - See Note 4331.l to move to IOSG::ALL-IN-1
Moderator:IOSG::PYE
Created:Thu Jan 30 1992
Last Modified:Tue Jan 23 1996
Last Successful Update:Fri Jun 06 1997
Number of topics:4343
Total number of notes:18308

3655.0. "Problem using the subprocess ..." by TAV02::CHAIM (Semper ubi Sub ubi .....) Sun Dec 12 1993 11:54

ALL-IN-1 V2.4

I am posting this note in both the ALL-IN-1 and CLI_SUPPORT conferences.

I have been assisting one customer in "integrating" an application. This
application is intended for a third customer.

The application is basically an image which does some processing including
displaying an FMS form. It then issues a lib$spawn to invoke a command
procedure.

The "integration" is very weak. We are merely attempting to run the image in
the subprocess. 

The developing customer did NOT have ALL-IN-1 installed, but it did have
WPS-PLUS/VMS V3.0. At the time I didn't see any reason why we couldn't
develope/test it on the WPS system.

We created a commands procedure which invokes an A1MBX command procedure to
define the oamilbox and dclmailbox. Then it issues a run ti their image. We
invoke this command procedure using COMMAND x.com\clear. This works fine under
WPS. When we tried running the same thing under ALL-IN-1 we fail; the image
apparently is unable to issue the lib$spawn. In ALL-IN-1, if we use DCL @x.com
then it does work fine. This however requires the user account to have DCL
privs in ALL-IN-1.

The developing customer is going to supply me with a debugged version of the
image. 

But perhaps someone can tell me what is the difference between the subprocess
being run by WPS-PLUS/VMS V3.0 and ALL-IN-1 V2.4. Also, in ALL-IN-1 why would
DCL @x.com work when COMMAND x.com does not.

Thanks,

Cb.  

T.RTitleUserPersonal
Name
DateLines
3655.1Use /NOBROADCAST ...TAV02::CHAIMSemper ubi Sub ubi .....Mon Dec 13 1993 11:0012
I believe that I've diagnosed the problem. The developer sent me an image which
was linked with DEBUG. The lib$spawn was failong with a CLI-E-TRMMBX. According
to a STARS article, this happens whem ALL-IN-1 is invoked with /BROADCAST (the
default). Invoking with /NOBROADCAST solves the problem. 

Now, I assume that WPSPLUS/VMS also is equivalent to /NOBROADCAST.

However, I would still like to understand why only COMMAND fails and not $ @.

Thanks,

Cb.