T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
3644.1 | use the dsab | IOSG::TYLDESLEY | | Wed Dec 08 1993 10:07 | 17 |
| Cb.
>>> ..the script file which does the create details for the VMS
>>> account. At the very end it also issues a DCL command to invoke
>>> authorize (not very elegant).
----
This is the only way it could be done, because of the way the UAI$
works. Scott, who wrote UAI$ will explain in more detail. I've
forgotten right now.
You do not need to use this 'inelegant' mechanism and the /flags
qualifier, because you can:
<write change UAI$ username=#username, captive = "1"
See Application Programming Ref Vol 1, page 7-123.
Cheers
DaveT
|
3644.2 | I'm embarrased ... | TAV02::CHAIM | Semper ubi Sub ubi ..... | Wed Dec 08 1993 10:33 | 14 |
| >
> You do not need to use this 'inelegant' mechanism and the /flags
> qualifier, because you can:
> <write change UAI$ username=#username, captive = "1"
> See Application Programming Ref Vol 1, page 7-123.
I'm embarrased, and I guess I was a little lazy.
BTW, why does the sm_create_user_details script issua a dcl AUTHORIZE at the
end to set /PWDEXPIRED. Couldn't this have been doen via the DSAB as well.
Thanks,
Cb.
|
3644.3 | will do | IOSG::TYLDESLEY | | Wed Dec 08 1993 10:59 | 12 |
| Hi Cb.
No need to be embarassed - UAI$ docn. is a little hidden ;-)
re sm_cr_user_details. At the time that this was converted to use UAI$,
UAI$ did not support setting the password expired. This was added at a
later date and since that time we have not had the resource to make and
test the change to use the dsab. (it's not a big fix, but it consumes
testers, PA etc.) I agree it would be nice to do, and will add it to my
list of nice-to-do's... (need a new whiteboard!).
Thanks for the reminder.
DaveT
|
3644.4 | CAPTIVE works? | BIGMAC::KARPEL | | Thu Jan 06 1994 19:03 | 4 |
| I thought I recalled a problem with the CAPTIVE flag and ALL-IN-1
printing. Don't you have to use RESTRICTED?
TK
|
3644.5 | STARS says.... | AIMTEC::WICKS_A | Atlanta's Most (In)famous Welshman | Thu Jan 06 1994 19:23 | 8 |
| CAPTIVE v RESTRICTED last discussed in note 2151 of the previous
version of the conference.
That note interestingly was posted by one Chaim Budnick!
regards,
Andrew.D.wicks
|