T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
3520.1 | | CTHP12::M_MORIN | | Wed Nov 10 1993 16:49 | 6 |
| Along the same lines, how is the protection set in the shared directory
files? Is it explicitely set to (S:RWED,O:RWED,G,W) or is it set from the
SYSGEN parameter RMS_FILEPROT?
/Mario
|
3520.2 | (RWED,RWED,,) | UTRACK::SCHOLLAERT | Ajax 8 - Heerenveen 4, next. | Thu Nov 11 1993 07:31 | 23 |
| Mario,
From STARS ....
$ DIR/SEC/OWN OA$SHARE:
Directory DISK$TECH:[ALLIN1.SHARED_E]
OA$DAF_E.DAT;4 [ALLIN1] (RWED,RWED,,)
In this example, the Shared Document Attributes File (SDAF) for
mail area E is correctly owned and protected. This ownership and
protection is passed to all files in shared directories belong-
ing to that mail area, so it is important that it is correct.
By the way, 3.0 does not generate OPCOM messages on failed
deletion. The user gets a %OA-W-CAB_NODELPRIV message. Entry
from docdb is gone. File left.
Regards,
Jan
|
3520.4 | Not customisable... | HERO::PYE | Graham Pye | Sun Nov 14 1993 17:33 | 11 |
| Although you can fix the Janitor so that it sets the appropriate protection
on the file, the janitor will need the appropriate directory protections in
order that it can do this.
There may be other places in the code that do the deletion that you won't
be able to customise, one of them might be the user's own Empty Wastebasket
function.
Graham
PS Why is S:D such a big deal anyway?
|
3520.5 | | CTHP12::M_MORIN | Mike, you owe me $553, thanks eh. | Mon Nov 15 1993 15:40 | 6 |
| A customer in Canada has a security requirement that dictates that they
cannot have the explicit setting of S:D protection in a login .COM file
(SET PROT/DEFAULT) or batch file, etc... An explicit S:D on SDAF.DAT though
is allowed though which fixes our problem.
/Mario
|