| T.R | Title | User | Personal Name
 | Date | Lines | 
|---|
| 3403.1 | EM's will be readable by all | GIDDAY::SETHI | Holland 2-England 0,Andrew was't there | Sun Oct 17 1993 23:53 | 17 | 
|  |     Hi Cb,
    
    The only thing that comes to mind is the security of the EM's.  By
    giving access to the main drawer users will be able to read mail and if
    it's of a personal or confidential nature it may cause personal
    embrassment to someone.  I am refering to the OUTBOX and READ BOX with
    some concern about the INBOX.
    
    The "extra" work of creating a new drawer and the overheads involved
    are so small.  I would rather have my work kept in some order so that I
    can be more efficient.  I remember reading somewhere that it's
    recommened that the MAIN is not shared, I think it was during the
    training course mainly due to the security of the EM's.
    
    Regards,
    
    Sunil
 | 
| 3403.2 | Keep GROUP and still have MAIN as private ?? | TAV02::CHAIM | Semper ubi Sub ubi ..... | Mon Oct 18 1993 06:55 | 9 | 
|  | If indeed the customer does wish to retain his MAIN drawers as non-shared,
is there a way that he can still have all his users within the same UIC group
with GROUP priveleges and yet keep the MAIN drawers private through ALL-IN-1 (I
realize he could probably place some "exotic" ACL's to accomplish this - but is
there any drawer management facility to accomplish this).
Thanks,
Cb.
 | 
| 3403.3 | This cannot be done | GIDDAY::SETHI | Holland 2-England 0,Andrew wasn't there | Mon Oct 18 1993 08:02 | 21 | 
|  |     Hi Cb,                             
    
    >is there any drawer management facility to accomplish this).
    
    Not that I am ware of, someone else maybe able to point you to one. The
    question about "exotic" ACL's will not work either because giving GROUP
    priv. is the eqv. of giving BYPASS BUT for that group only.
    
    OpenVMS security works by checking the primary protection which is the
    G:RWED and the process privs., than it checks the ACL's.  So if you
    have group priv. and have the protection of G:NOACCESS it will bypass
    the protection because GROUP priv. grants access.  
    
    Why do the users require GROUP priv. ?  If it's to run an application
    the System Manager/Mangler may as well install the image with GROUP
    priv.  Also topic 3045 it maybe of some help, looks like alot of
    hardwork for very little gain to me.
    
    Regards,
    
    Sunil
 |