|
If you've ever dealt with WP support, (and I have), it is important to
be absolutely certain of where ALL-IN-1 leaves off and Word Perfect
Integration begins.
It's not a question of teflon at all, but of avoiding finger pointing.
Regards
-K
|
| (For the umpteen-zillionth time)
The WP integration sends/recieves WP docs in an NBS DECBODY1 bodypart
rather than the DECBODY7 that everything else uses. The combination
of ALL-IN-1 + WP integration will only recognize and record received
DECBODY1s as WP documents. Similarly WP docs sent from ALL-IN-1
won't be processable by most other MAILbus applications (though
A1MAIL can be reconfigured nowadays to handle DECBODY1s). There is
nothing "wrong" with their integration, and there is nothing "wrong"
with the rest of MAILbus, but WP's design/implimentation choice
obviously presents an interworking problem. Back when they initially
did their development work, the nowadays generally accepted practice
of shipping arbitrary documents/files around in DECBODY7s didn't exist,
and interworking between IOS+WP and the rest of the MAILbus world
wasn't much of an issue. Today customers are using MAILbus to link
together may differant environments using user agents and gateways
that didn't even exist then, and this interworking issue is now seen
frequently. The 'teflon' I referred to is that for some reason this
interworking issue is apparently always perceived by customers as a
Digital problem (in particular IOS), not a WP integration problem.
Conceptually, there are only three solutions
1) Get WP to update their integration to interwork with 'the world'
2) Get 'the world' to update their software to interwork with WP
3) Modify ALL-IN-1 to work around the third-party WP integration
IMHO, (1) is the correct choice, but none of the choices are something
that can be done quickly. They all involve an investment of engineering
and development resources and _time_. I would not expect your call to
WP support to get a solution, but perhaps if enough customers call
enough times they will get the message, so go ahead and call them.
In the meantime, quite a few people have developed a number of hacks
to workaround the problem in a number of differant fashions. Research
in here and other current and archived conferences will reveal these.
Besides this conference and its earlier incarnations, try MSG_SOLUTIONS,
the old X400MAIL conf, MAILBUS old and current, and probably others
that I don't happen to monitor. This is not a new problem.
Dave
|