T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
3322.1 | Discussed more times than I can count to | AIMTEC::WICKS_A | U.S.A 2 England 0 - I was there! | Tue Sep 28 1993 22:50 | 11 |
| Martin
A dir or a search would show bunches of matches on this particularly
the messy legal rubbish about not letting ALL-IN-1 v3.0 customers
get their hands on CDA 2.0
there's notes 2821, 1230, 2034, 1542 ... you get the idea!
regards,
Andrew.D.Wicks
|
3322.2 | | UTRTSC::SCHOLLAERT | Ajax, last hope of Holland | Thu Sep 30 1993 09:53 | 9 |
| Hi,
In Holland we decided that is it cheaper to just let
that handfull of customers install 2.0 (most of them
have CD's) than (re-)start policy/pricing discussions again and again.
Regards,
Jan
|
3322.3 | | IOSG::BURTON | ALL-IN-1 Builder | Thu Sep 30 1993 17:26 | 8 |
| Jan,
I believe part of the problem specifically with CDA V2.0, is that
Digital pay a royalty to a 3rd party for every licence sold. Have you
checked with the product manager (either for ALL-IN-1 or for CDA)
whether your action has contravened whatever agreement is in force.
Martin.
|
3322.4 | | UTRTSC::SCHOLLAERT | Ajax, last hope of Holland | Fri Oct 01 1993 08:47 | 13 |
| Martin,
>Digital pay a royalty to a 3rd party for every licence sold. Have
>you checked with the product manager (either for ALL-IN-1 or for CDA)
>whether your action has contravened whatever agreement is in force.
No. The decision was made by local management. I will inform them
about the 3rd party royalty.
Thanks,
Jan
|