[Search for users] [Overall Top Noters] [List of all Conferences] [Download this site]

Conference iosg::all-in-1_v30

Title:*OLD* ALL-IN-1 (tm) Support Conference
Notice:Closed - See Note 4331.l to move to IOSG::ALL-IN-1
Moderator:IOSG::PYE
Created:Thu Jan 30 1992
Last Modified:Tue Jan 23 1996
Last Successful Update:Fri Jun 06 1997
Number of topics:4343
Total number of notes:18308

3251.0. "FCS ACCVIO "submit an SPR"" by KAOT01::R_OBAS () Thu Sep 09 1993 00:55

    
    Hello,
    
      I have this intermittent customer problem that the FCS ACCVIO once
    in a while.
     
     Apparently they tracked down the culprit. A user with a shared drawer,
     GMA to another user (may not be connected to the problem). When this
     user go to EM and create a message, the user get's an error
    
      "An error has occured, submit an SPR". Nobody will be able to do
     anything at this time. So they will kill the FCS process and re-start
     and the problem goes away and may not happen again for another week.
     Does it make sense regarding the shared drawer ? I did lots of test
     and I just can't make FCS to accvio. Any hints please ?
    
    Thanks,
    ricardo
T.RTitleUserPersonal
Name
DateLines
3251.1Some tools to get more informationBUSHIE::SETHIThu Sep 09 1993 04:3340
    Hi Ricardo,                                                       
    
    >"An error has occured, submit an SPR"
    
    Can the user do a GOLD W to get more information ?
    
    Have you checked the logfiles in SYS$MANAGER, namely the
    OAFC$SERVER_ERROR.LOG ?  If you can search through this file for the
    date and time this problem occured there might be more information to
    help point to the cause.  By the way if this logfile is quite large you
    can roll it over by renaming it to *.OLD and a new one will be created
    by the FCS.  We also have the tracing option but we can leave that
    aside for the moment.
    
    >So they will kill the FCS process and re-start and the problem goes away 
    >and may not happen again for another week.
    
    What version of ALL-IN-1 IOS do they have ? Is it 3.0-1 ?  I am
    guessing that the cache get's trashed for some reason.  I have had
    similar problems at customer sites and we have had to stop and restart
    the server.  
    
    If you find that you are having to stop/restart the server every week
    during core or prime time than there are two options that will cause
    less distruption.  These are:
    
    1. Stop and restart the server after hours some of my customers are
       doing this.
    
    2. Have multiple servers running useful at large sites and assign users
       to the server as required.  You will need to define the logical
       OAFC$SRV_OBJ nnn, to point the user to the server of choice.  See
       topic 3137 for more details.
    
    I am sure Uncle Bob will have alot more to say and my remarks are there
    to help you trace the problem and narrow down the possiblities.
    
    Regards,
    
    Sunil
3251.2Just a couple little things...CHRLIE::HUSTONThu Sep 09 1993 16:1313
    
    The only thing I have to say is:
    
    Check sys$manager:oafc$server.log as well as oafc$server_error.log.
    
    If you feel you can reproduce this (you imply you can with the GMA),
    then turn on FCS tracing and reproduce, format the trace file and 
    include it in the spr and/or put it in here. Please try to keep the
    amount of time the trace is on minimized as the trace file will get
    very big, very fast.
    
    --Bob
    
3251.3Not reproducible .....KAOFS::R_OBASThu Sep 09 1993 21:099
     Sorry I was not very clear in .o.
    
      Te problem occurs when a user with shared drawer (gma to another
    user...but the granter is the one creating a message, not the user
    granted.) Unfortunately after the re-start, the problem can
    longer be reproduced, it will work for a period of time @3 weeks. So he 
    does'nt want put a trace. We will wait for another occurence unless 
    anybody is interested in the previous logs.
    
3251.4Maybe a good idea to post some more info.BUSHIE::SETHIFri Sep 10 1993 01:5420
    G'day,
    
    Re .3.
    
    I think that you should still search the logfile for the date and time
    of the occurance of the problem, than give us a pointer to the logfile
    or copy a small portion of it in a reply.  We may have enough
    information to work on if not we maybe able to give you further trouble
    shooting hints and tips.  So in short I would say it's a good idea to
    examin the old logfiles and what would be really helpful is a sequence
    of events, leading upto the problem.
    
    The only reason why I am interested in the logfiles is to get some idea
    of why this problem has occured.  The sooner we get a clue as to why
    this is happening the sooner we will get a fix in a PFR.  Yes be
    selfish and post the information :-).
    
    Regards,
    
    Sunil
3251.5two different purposesCHRLIE::HUSTONFri Sep 10 1993 14:2912
    
    We are talking about two files here, the one sunil is talking about
    is always a good idea to look at when problems occur. The FCS should
    be writing unexpected things to that file, it theoretically would be
    empty at all times for a perfect FCS.
    
    The one I want is the FCS trace output. I agree, don't run with it on
    all the time. Next time the problem occurs, turn trace on and do the
    steps to get the problem, then turn trace off. Post that file here.
    
    --Bob