T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
3204.1 | SDAF Master file problem? | IOSG::MAURICE | Differently hirsute | Tue Aug 31 1993 09:21 | 22 |
| Hi,
In V3.0 you should have got the TRM error message:
"Invalid shared document pointer - mail area does not exist"
What version of TRM is reported at the beginning of the log? What
filename is being reported as being in error? If the filename is
OA$SHARxnnn:Zmumble then check:
1. Is OA$SHARx in the SDAF Master file, and if the answer is yes then
...
2. Is logical OA$SHARxnnn defined?
My guess is that there is a record in the SDAF Master file that
shouldn't be there.
Cheers
Stuart
|
3204.2 | 3.0 it is | UTRTSC::SCHOLLAERT | You name, we support it... | Tue Aug 31 1993 11:39 | 48 |
| Stuart,
> In V3.0 you should have got the TRM error message:
> "Invalid shared document pointer - mail area does not exist"
Phase 1 contains this error about 40 times. Like...
Scanning Drawer [CORNELISSENH]BASIS at 04:57 AM
------------------------------------------
Invalid shared document pointer - mail area does not exist
Filename = OA$SHARB305:ZUSVO6VET.WPL
Folder = INBOX Number = 001935
Title = I: Aan de ORde
Number of DOCDB records read: 358 - 04:57 AM
All file names refer to the mail area of the system
the users where transfered from. The area does not exist
on this node.
Phase 3 contains about 70 error like:
Error attempting to repair DAF record with key OA$SHARB951:ZUSJSLRPR.TXT
-- ?I/O channel not open
The files are different from the ones reported in phase 1.
> What version of TRM is reported at the beginning of the log?
Version 3.1-5
> 1. Is OA$SHARx in the SDAF Master file, and if the answer is yes then
Nop. Its the OA$SHARx from the originating node.
All problem users are transfered from a 3.0 system onto this
system some time ago. Worrying thing to me is that the transfer
partly failed. How comes ?
To repair the damage, is creating the mail areas and
running TRM enough ?
Regards,
Jan
|
3204.3 | | IOSG::MAURICE | Differently hirsute | Wed Sep 01 1993 10:56 | 16 |
| Hi,
It looks like that in the verify pass TRM correctly detected the
references to a non-existent shared area, but does not process them
properly in the repair stage.
I think your idea of creating a OA$SHARB mail area is best, but you
will have to define the mail directories, e.g. OA$SHARB305, as well.
I had thought Transfer User had been fixed in V3 so that these problems
do not arise. Are you sure it was a V3 to V3 transfer? Any
customisations?
Cheers
Stuart
|
3204.4 | phase 1 and phase 3 files are not the same | UTRTSC::SCHOLLAERT | You name, we support it... | Wed Sep 01 1993 13:20 | 22 |
| Hello Stuart,
> It looks like that in the verify pass TRM correctly detected the
> references to a non-existent shared area, but does not process them
> properly in the repair stage.
Well, actually all files referenced in phase 1 are different
from those in phase 3. These are all attachments to valid mail
messages.
> I had thought Transfer User had been fixed in V3 so that these problems
> do not arise. Are you sure it was a V3 to V3 transfer? Any
> customisations?
3.0 English to 3.0 Dutch. No customisations. All transfer
data is deleted so it's impossible to reproduce the problem.
I will asked them to keep the data and account the next time
they transfer a user.
Regards,
Jan
|
3204.5 | Getting closer... | UTRTSC::SCHOLLAERT | You name, we support it... | Thu Sep 02 1993 15:10 | 42 |
| Hi,
I can reproduce the problem by tranferring an account with
inconcistencies like non-existing shared vms file or reference
to non-existing SDAF.
The log file contains errors which lead easily to the problem,
but because the status is not checked correctly, the MANAGER
does not receive mail....
Example (OA$TRANSFER_A1INFO.LOG):
Directory spec is USER1:[A1INFO.XA1]
Default drawer flag = Y
SET_DRAWER to [A1INFO]BASIS
Successfully processed ONGELEZEN,000010
Failed to transfer VERZONDEN,000009
Skipping document TEST,000008
Skipping document TEST,000007
. . . . . .
Skipping document TEST,000001
Clearing last lot of files to saveset...
Complete.
%OA-E-IOOPEN, Fout bij openen van bestand
"USER1:[ALLIN1.SHARE4]ZUVPK4G9D.WPL;"
-RMS-E-FNF, file not found
%OA-W-ARCERROR, Fout bij centraal archiveren van document uit archiefkast
van g
-OA-I-LASTLINE, A1INFO
-OA-I-LASTLINE, VERZONDEN 000009
-OA-I-LASTLINE, TRANSFER$AREA:AINFO1458000009.ARCHIVE
-OA-E-IOOPEN, Fout bij openen van bestand "!AS"
$ if arch_status.ne.1 then goto log_failure
$!
$ a1_full_spec = f$edit(a1_full_spec, "COLLAPSE")
Regards,
Jan
|
3204.6 | Transfer User Not Perfect Yet | AIMTEC::GRENIER_J | | Tue Nov 16 1993 01:28 | 14 |
| Problem happened on a large customer site. This customer has lots of
transfers to perform and would like to know if there is a fix?
Transferred account from V3.0 (system had 4 DAF's) - to another V3.0
system which only has OA$SHARE. The users's docdb's and daf's are
correct - but the system daf has the invalid pointers for the
attachments. CSN updates the "top level DAF pointer" - but the
pointers to attachments are still pointing to the old mail areas.
The users can see the mail fine, along with the attachments - but
FCVR goes crazy and fails.
What to tell the customer???
Jean
|
3204.7 | Yes, it looks like a bug | IOSG::TALLETT | Gimmee an Alpha colour notebook... | Tue Nov 16 1993 20:32 | 11 |
|
This problem has recently been reported on an internal DEC site.
As this is a customer problem, may I suggest you use your regular
support channels?
From what I've seen of the problem, the duff SDAF pointers can be
removed without loss of data, but this is somewhat similar to
"open heart surgery"!
Thanks,
Paul
|
3204.9 | yes | ODIXIE::WOLFE | John Wolfe - (404)-924-6463 | Wed Jul 13 1994 21:32 | 4 |
|
A1FIX029030 and A1FIX037030 seem to have fixed it on at least two
systems I know of. These require ALL-IN-1 V3.0A.
|