T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
2923.1 | What formatter? | IOSG::NEWLAND | Richard Newland, IOSG, REO2-G/L2 | Fri Jun 25 1993 15:00 | 4 |
| ALL-IN-1 supports more than one formatter. What formatter is being used to
format DX documents? This is defined by the DX entry in the FORMAT master.
Richard
|
2923.2 | Theres more.... | EBYGUM::PAGETS | Still Working | Fri Jun 25 1993 16:32 | 35 |
|
Just had a look in the format file and the entry fo DX is as below:
Name: DX
Description: DECdx formatted document
Default Filename: .DX
Object Extension:
DSAB Type: DX
Template Filename:
Edit Function:
Initialisation File:
Purge Count:
Editor Type:
List Function:
Print Function:
Standard Formatting: N
Compile Command:
Template form:
Is there a print function I should be using? Should it be set up for
Standard Formatting?
Cheers,
Sean.
|
2923.3 | Upgrade to v3.0 is always a good idea | AIMTEC::WICKS_A | U.S.A 2 England 0 - I was there! | Fri Jun 25 1993 16:41 | 11 |
| Sean,
and to answer your trailing question. ALL-IN-1 v2.4 will be supported
for quite a long time yet - at least until another major release of
ALL-IN-1 occurs. However there are many good reasons for moving you
or your customer to v3.0 as soon as possible so you should not hold
back on that.
Regards,
Andrew.D.Wicks
|
2923.4 | Customisation...who needs it. | BLKPUD::PAGETS | Still Working | Wed Jun 30 1993 12:02 | 9 |
|
Unfortunately, due to the level of customisation on site, V3.0 is not
an immediate option, but more of a long term goal.
Has any one any idea about the DX problem?
Cheers,
Sean Paget.
|