[Search for users]
[Overall Top Noters]
[List of all Conferences]
[Download this site]
Title: | *OLD* ALL-IN-1 (tm) Support Conference |
Notice: | Closed - See Note 4331.l to move to IOSG::ALL-IN-1 |
Moderator: | IOSG::PYE |
|
Created: | Thu Jan 30 1992 |
Last Modified: | Tue Jan 23 1996 |
Last Successful Update: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
Number of topics: | 4343 |
Total number of notes: | 18308 |
2893.0. "<DOWN> in Index aborts Index form" by UTES09::EIJS (Simon Eijs @Utrecht; 838-2558) Mon Jun 21 1993 17:49
Hi,
A quick question.
Situation: ALL-IN-1 V2.4 English. Patch 601, 602 and 603.
A normal Index form, no special processing. Using a VT340, after
building the Index, and instead of using <NEXT PAGE>, <NEXT SCREEN>,
the customer is holding <DOWN> continiously. The 'bell' for the buffer
overflow is there allright. Now, at a particular point the user is put
back in the form from which the Index was called (this is an ARG form,
not a MENU form). The first error message:
Error processing form SEM$MAIL$INDEX
And also an FDV message appears (unfortunately I cannot recall the
exact contents of the message).
My question is if someone ever saw this happen, or better, if this
might be a problem with FMS?
Regrads,
Simon
T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
2893.1 | Data overrun error | IOSG::CHINNICK | gone walkabout | Tue Jun 22 1993 10:31 | 21 |
| Simon,
I doubt that this is a problem but rather I think it's expected
behaviour.
When you fill the typeahead buffer the system sends either BEL or XOFF
depending upon your terminal settings. If you keep sending data and the
buffer overflows with some characters being lost then the system
returns SS$_DATAOVERUN status to indicate that data is lost. From
memory, FMS will return this as an error status to ALL-IN-1.
If you want to stop this then either:
- change the terminal characteristics to /HOSTSYNC which should
force keyboard lock when the buffer fills
- re-educate the users to not fill the buffer
- set a larger typeahead buffer - possibly even set /ALTYPEAHD
So - no problem with FMS - it's doing what it ought to.
Paul.
|