T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
2886.1 | | IOSG::MAURICE | Night rolls in, my dark companion | Mon Jun 21 1993 09:41 | 9 |
| Have all the V2.4 patches been applied?
If it hasn't been run for a long time, I recommend that the for the
first run(s) you turn off body file checking. It'll have enough other
work to keep it busy.
Cheers
Stuart
|
2886.2 | Patches in place ... | TAV02::CHAIM | Semper ubi Sub ubi ..... | Mon Jun 21 1993 12:16 | 15 |
|
> Have all the V2.4 patches been applied?
Yes.
>
> If it hasn't been run for a long time, I recommend that the for the
> first run(s) you turn off body file checking. It'll have enough other
> work to keep it busy.
That's precisely what I have done. Awaiting results from the custmer.
Thanks,
Cb.
|
2886.3 | Beware the V2.3 patched version | IOSG::MAURICE | Night rolls in, my dark companion | Mon Jun 21 1993 12:26 | 7 |
| One other trap to look for - do a $dir/dat of oa$sm_fcvr.exe. There is a
problem that if the customer upgraded from a V2.3 patched system, then
it may be running the patched V2.3 version.
Cheers
Stuart
|
2886.4 | Using wrong oa$sm_fcvr.exe | TAV02::CHAIM | Semper ubi Sub ubi ..... | Tue Jun 22 1993 15:22 | 16 |
| As well that ends well.
A careful investigation showed that there was a copy of
oa$sm_fcvr.exe in the oa$site_lib_llv directory.
This version was evidently the version from the original installation,
at leaset the creation date indiates this. A version with
a ceation date which corresponds to when the patches were
applied was found in oa$lib_share.
After getting rid of the version in oa$site_lib_llv, all seems
to function properly.
Thanks for all the assistance.
Cb.
|