T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
2877.1 | .FILL1 = .FROM_ADDRESS ??? | BERN02::MUELLERS | Stefan A Mueller 761-4864 | Thu Jun 17 1993 13:55 | 6 |
| I just tried a
<write change cal$meeting %key=#key,fill1="blablabla"
and called MEETING. The string "blablabla" has been written into a
field called "From Address" (ME_FROM_ADDRESS).
Stefan
|
2877.2 | CAL$MEETING: help is still needed! | BERN02::MUELLERS | Stefan A Mueller 761-4864 | Wed Jun 23 1993 10:37 | 44 |
| Hi again!
There seem to be nobody having dealed with time management...
If somone likes to do a little test, the script below will show that
the way CALENDAR SCHEDULE MEETING and CAL$MEETING are working together
is different in V2.4 and V3.0.
Do the following:
$ ALLIN1
TMS
<DO A1030_DEMO_MTNG_FILLER
... and enter data as if you were creating a meeting
In V2.4 you'll get the following output on line 24:
TEST CAL SCHED MEETING This is the content of field FILLER
In V3.0 the output looks like this:
TEST CAL SCHED MEETING
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
!
! A1030_DEMO_MTNG_FILLER.SCP
!
GET #CAL_MTNG_EXTRA = "This is the content of field FILLER"
GET #CAL_MTNG_LOC = "Somewhere"
GET #CAL_MTNG_DESC = "TEST CAL SCHED MEETING"
GET #CAL_MTNG_CONFID= "N"
GET #CAL_MTNG_ETIME = "14.00"
GET #CAL_MTNG_STIME = "13.00"
GET #CAL_MTNG_PRIORITY = ""
GET #CAL_MTNG_WHEN = "17.Jun.1994"
GET #CAL_MTNG_SCHEDULER = OA$USER
GET #ME_AP_FLAG=OA$Y
FORM SCHDMA
.IF OA$FORM_DISPOSE EQS "0" THEN .EXIT
GET #NOVALID="VAL_DONE"
CALENDAR SCHEDULE MEETING
GET #NOVALID=""
GET CAL$MEETING.MEETING_PURPOSE:40[#CAL_MEETING_POINTER] .FILLER
.EXIT
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|
2877.3 | | PEARS::GRAEF | Ghinees hies good for you. | Wed Jun 23 1993 13:35 | 6 |
| I hate to say it, but the CAL$MEETING action routine has a bug in
the PUT_FIELD and GET_FIELD code. The field offsets for FROM_ADDRESS,
FILL1, and FILL2 are off by 1.
Cheers,
helmut
|
2877.4 | What can I do? | BERN02::MUELLERS | Stefan A Mueller 761-4864 | Wed Jun 23 1993 14:21 | 4 |
| Thanks Helmut! Seems to be easy to get fixed. What would you - or
someone else - suggest me to do ?
Stefan
|
2877.5 | | PEARS::GRAEF | Ghinees hies good for you. | Wed Jun 23 1993 15:02 | 13 |
| Stefan,
unfortunately this problem is more serious. In addtion to the
wrong field offsets within the action routine, the form MEETING
(which is used to convert an old meeting file) has a different
field layout as the one defined in code. Form MEETING defines
field ME_FILLER positioned right after the 40 byte ME_FROM_ADDRESS,
whereas the code expects to see a 512 byte FROM_ADRRESS followed by
field FILLER.
Confusing? Imagine how confusing it will be for users working
with TM after an upgrade from ALL-IN-1 V2.4.
Cheers,
helmut
|
2877.6 | Patch? | BERN02::MUELLERS | Stefan A Mueller 761-4864 | Wed Jun 23 1993 15:58 | 5 |
| Helmut,
do you know if a patch for this problem is available? Or is it
necessary to escalate this problem to get it fixed for the customer?
Stefan
|
2877.7 | Surely you know this | AIMTEC::WICKS_A | U.S.A 2 England 0 - I was there! | Wed Jun 23 1993 17:23 | 7 |
| stefan,
Official Support requires SPRs
Regards,
Andrew.D.Wicks
|