| Title: | *OLD* ALL-IN-1 (tm) Support Conference |
| Notice: | Closed - See Note 4331.l to move to IOSG::ALL-IN-1 |
| Moderator: | IOSG::PYE |
| Created: | Thu Jan 30 1992 |
| Last Modified: | Tue Jan 23 1996 |
| Last Successful Update: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
| Number of topics: | 4343 |
| Total number of notes: | 18308 |
Hello there,
Does anybody have any comments on the consequences I should expect if I
modified the ALL-IN-1 mailbox from A1 to AM.
My customer is actually a TeamLinks implementation and as DEC MailWorks
does not provide any automatic DDS subsriber entry build functionality
they are interested in fudging the DDS entry creation using the
ALL-IN-1 user creation procedures to get the DDS entry created
to point to the AM mailbox.
IOS was installed with OA$DDS_PRIME set to 1. They would have to
change the existing user template to have 'Mail Directory' set to Y.
What about other housekeeping procedures, or internal processing
mechanisms. Should I expect any problems here.
I would have to modify the mailbox identifier in A1CONFIG. Anywhere
else I should be aware of.
Thanks.. Liz
| T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2798.1 | Why? | AIMTEC::WICKS_A | June 7-13 Real Football in the U.S | Thu Jun 03 1993 18:04 | 19 |
Liz,
Apart from the technical confusion this would cause when your customer
called the CSC you mean? i'm sorry but most people will assume that
A1 = real ALL-IN-1
AM = DEC MAILworks, TeamLinks Mail, ALL-IN-1 Mail etc etc ...
Wouldn't it be better to leave the mailbox at A1 and use a soon to be
in field test product that allows REAL ALL-IN-1 mail to be used from
TeamLinks?
Apart from DDS you'd have to thinks about NETWORK.DAt, Distribution
Lists and maybe Nicknames
Is it worth the confusion? I know the customer is ALWAYS right.
Regards,
Andrew.D.wicks
| |||||