| Title: | *OLD* ALL-IN-1 (tm) Support Conference |
| Notice: | Closed - See Note 4331.l to move to IOSG::ALL-IN-1 |
| Moderator: | IOSG::PYE |
| Created: | Thu Jan 30 1992 |
| Last Modified: | Tue Jan 23 1996 |
| Last Successful Update: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
| Number of topics: | 4343 |
| Total number of notes: | 18308 |
Hello. I have a question on the choices between " AT " and "@".
Due to the limitation on V2.4, we are forced to make an ALL-IN-1
username less than 21 characters long, or we can't create a meeting
record into the CAL$ATTENDEE DSAB.
I've made advice to my customer so, but he can't receive a reply
without failing to update the CAL$ATTENDEE when he has proposed to
have a meeting with any 20 characters long attendee.
I've checked and found,
CAL$ATTENDEE:MEETING_POINTER.ATTENDEE_NAME[#MEETING_POINTER] is
TWENTY78901234567890@A1@NODNAM
but the responder's name displayed on the mail header is always
TWENTY78901234567890 AT A1 AT NODNAM
The above string is 36 characters long, so an error %OA-E-CMATNDWRITERR
occurs, I think.
I've found some nodes makes FIELD[FROM] using "@", and others using
" AT ".
Can I forced ALL-IN-1 to build NBS files only using "@" signs within
FIELD[FROM] (which corresponds to CAB$.FROM_ADDRESS[OA$CURMES] in SDAF) ?
Any input will be appreciated, thanks.
Yukiji/CSC/Tokyo
| T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2761.1 | upgrade??? | AIMTEC::ZANIEWSKI_D | Why would CSC specialists need training? | Thu May 27 1993 13:06 | 3 |
What about upgrading to version 3.0, where this is not a problem?
Dave Zaniewski
| |||||
| 2761.2 | AT in OA$MTI_AREA? | AIMTEC::WICKS_A | Alphatraz - Coming Summer 93 | Thu May 27 1993 16:24 | 8 |
Yukiji,
does the system perhaps have the logical OA$MTI_AREA set?
if so what does it look like.
regards,
Andrew.D.Wicks
| |||||
| 2761.3 | Thanks, but... | EWBV51::NAGURA | Geigen Spieler | Fri May 28 1993 09:23 | 10 |
Andrew,
> does the system perhaps have the logical OA$MTI_AREA set?
> if so what does it look like.
Thank you for your reply, but we don't have that logical.
Yukiji
| |||||
| 2761.4 | Japanese ALL-IN-1? | AIMTEC::WICKS_A | Alphatraz - Coming Summer 93 | Fri May 28 1993 15:56 | 10 |
Yukiji,
OK when you send normal remote mail (not TM) does the from field
look like user AT mbx AT node or user@mbx@node.
This is Hanji v2.4 correct?
Regards,
Andrew.D.Wicks
| |||||
| 2761.5 | EWBV51::NAGURA | Ich kann Geige spielen. | Mon May 31 1993 01:29 | 14 | |
> OK when you send normal remote mail (not TM) does the from field
> look like user AT mbx AT node or user@mbx@node.
Also displayed as 'user AT mbx AT node'.
> This is Hanji v2.4 correct?
No, Japanese version isn't called Hanji. It used Kanji, but not
called Kanji ALL-IN-1 either.
As for patches, it has up to K604.
Regards, Yukiji
| |||||