Title: | *OLD* ALL-IN-1 (tm) Support Conference |
Notice: | Closed - See Note 4331.l to move to IOSG::ALL-IN-1 |
Moderator: | IOSG::PYE |
Created: | Thu Jan 30 1992 |
Last Modified: | Tue Jan 23 1996 |
Last Successful Update: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
Number of topics: | 4343 |
Total number of notes: | 18308 |
ALL-IN-1 V2.4 A customer complained of receiving an INVFUNVAR error while attempting to edit an event. Using trace I identified the problem in TMSEVE.SCP : !If this is the scheduler then let him edit it FORM EDTMTGUI .IF OA$FORM_DISPOSE EQS "0" THEN .EXIT CAL RES MEET .IF OA$STATUS EQS "1" - THEN GET OA$DISPLAY = OA$_TM_RESCHSENT \force ! (Event Rescheduled and notices sent) CAL DISP MEET #TEMP_CALKEY **** OA$SCL_UPDATE *CAL.%address[#TEMP_CALKEY] OA$SCL_REFRESH .GOTO END The trace shows that there is no value for *CAL.%address[#TEMP_CALKEY]. I replaced this with CAL$CALENDAR.%address[#TEMP_CALKEY] and it appears to work fine. My suspicion is that the phantom data base was not yet updated with the new reord. Could someone verify/contradict this suspicion? Also is this "fix" sufficient. Thanks, Cb.
T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2659.1 | SIOG::T_REDMOND | Thoughts of an Idle Mind | Sat May 08 1993 21:58 | 7 | |
Hi Chaim, If the CAL$CALENDAR.%ADDRESS DSR is picking up the right record then your fix is OK.... If not, it's not. I can't see anything wrong with the approach here. T | |||||
2659.2 | What about V3.0 .. | TAV02::CHAIM | Semper ubi Sub ubi ..... | Sun May 09 1993 06:33 | 15 |
Thanks Tony, > > If the CAL$CALENDAR.%ADDRESS DSR is picking up the right record then > your fix is OK.... If not, it's not. I can't see anything wrong with > the approach here. > It appears that it is. I'm still puzzled why *CAL.%ADDRESS is returning a "null" value. How does the V3.0 code treat this issue? Thanks, Cb. |