[Search for users]
[Overall Top Noters]
[List of all Conferences]
[Download this site]
Title: | *OLD* ALL-IN-1 (tm) Support Conference |
Notice: | Closed - See Note 4331.l to move to IOSG::ALL-IN-1 |
Moderator: | IOSG::PYE |
|
Created: | Thu Jan 30 1992 |
Last Modified: | Tue Jan 23 1996 |
Last Successful Update: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
Number of topics: | 4343 |
Total number of notes: | 18308 |
2645.0. "Programmer/maintainer setup - Problem with COPY function" by COMICS::BARHAM (Norbert:) Fri Apr 30 1993 12:48
ALL-IN-1 3.0-1
There must be something obvious I'm missing here but...
Customer logged a call which I reproduced. If I make myself an application
programmer (with APP=P), I receive the identifier OA$PRVAPP. If I then
decide to make myself an Application Maintainer (APP=A), I get OA$MANAPP
identifier granted. Problem is that I should, as a Maintainer, be able to
MLA and then AM ML (move to live), but because OA$PRVAPP is the first in my
list of ACE's on the site directory, the ML fails with error
Problem with COPY function - file ""
In this particular case I was trying to move MAILMEMO1 to live. The
security on the site BLP_BRITISH.DIR is :-
Directory DISK$APPLICATIONS:[ALLIN1.SITE]
BLP_BRITISH.DIR;1 OA$MANAPP (RWE,RWE,RE,)
(IDENTIFIER=OA$PRVAPP,ACCESS=READ)
(IDENTIFIER=OA$PRVAPP,OPTIONS=DEFAULT,ACCESS=READ)
(IDENTIFIER=OA$MANAPP,ACCESS=READ+WRITE+EXECUTE+DELETE)
(IDENTIFIER=OA$MANAPP,OPTIONS=DEFAULT,ACCESS=READ+WRITE+EXECUTE+
DELETE)
(DEFAULT_PROTECTION,SYSTEM:RWED,OWNER:RWED,GROUP:RE,WORLD:)
My process priveleges are :-
Process privileges:
TMPMBX may create temporary mailbox
NETMBX may create network device
Process rights:
INTERACTIVE
REMOTE
OAFC$SYSMAN
OA$PRVAPP resource
OA$MANAPP resource
Therefore, since OA$PRVAPP is first, I get identified as a programmer before I
get identified as a maintainer (I think !)
I don't need additional VMS privs do I ?
Should I swap the ACE's around on all the directories ? (I tried this but had
problems).
Thanks,
Clive
T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
2645.1 | At least wqe thought it was for 3.0-1 | IOSG::BILSBOROUGH | Just testing. Please ignore!!! | Fri Apr 30 1993 14:57 | 7 |
|
This is a problem and should have been fixed in 3.0-1. A post install
tasks should change the order.
Are you sure it's 3.0-1?
Mike
|