[Search for users] [Overall Top Noters] [List of all Conferences] [Download this site]

Conference iosg::all-in-1_v30

Title:*OLD* ALL-IN-1 (tm) Support Conference
Notice:Closed - See Note 4331.l to move to IOSG::ALL-IN-1
Moderator:IOSG::PYE
Created:Thu Jan 30 1992
Last Modified:Tue Jan 23 1996
Last Successful Update:Fri Jun 06 1997
Number of topics:4343
Total number of notes:18308

2560.0. "DATA_FILE GET_NEXT results in an ACCVIO..." by VNOTSC::EHRLICH (With the Power & the Glory) Wed Apr 14 1993 08:52

Hi folks,

	oh dear, I know, it's me and the COV again. The story with the
SUBSCRIBER DSAB goes on. (Remember note 2528). They ran into the next problem 
    but now with the DATA_FILE function.

Boilerplate: ABT.BLP
--------------------
<&oa do ABT>        
                    
DO-Script ABT.SCP   
-----------------             
data_file open dds subscriber
.Label Loop                   
data_file get_next dds       
.if oa$status ne 1 then .goto Ok
data_file get_field dds commname #Name 
data_file get_field dds orgunit1 #Unit 
Get oa$merge_line = #Name:30 " Abt = " #Unit
.goto Loop                                  
.Label Ok                                    
data_file Close dds                         
                                             
Called via <MERGE ABT,ABT.LIS from ALL-IN-1 Menu.                           

Running ALL-IN-1 V2.4-1 German this produces a list of all DDS subscribers.
But with ALL-IN-1 V3.0-1 German an ACCVIO occours at 'data_file get_next dds'.

%SYSTEM-F-ACCVIO, access violation, reason mask=00, virtual address=0000001C,
PC=001A5DAC, PSL=03C00004

  Improperly handled condition, image exit forced.

	Signal arguments	      Stack contents

	Number = 00000005		 7FE6653C
	Name   = 0000000C		 000F05AE
		 00000000		 000EF6D8
		 0000001C		 0035CC08
		 001A5DAC		 0007BAA4
		 03C00004		 00000000
					 203C0000
					 7FE66578
					 7FE6653C
					 000F05F5

	Register dump

	R0 = 00000000  R1 = 820B43A0  R2 = 000EF6D8  R3 = 0035CC08
	R4 = 0007BAA4  R5 = 001A5D8C  R6 = 0035CC08  R7 = 00000001
	R8 = 00000000  R9 = 001D33EF  R10= 000CC40E  R11= 000F1585
	AP = 7FE66484  FP = 7FE66444  SP = 7FE664C0  PC = 001A5DAC
	PSL= 03C00004

Can you help me here and bring me some light in the dark? Sounds like it
is a bug here, therefore should I SPR this, or is it right known?

Best regards and many thanks in advance

Charly_from_CSC_Vienna
    
T.RTitleUserPersonal
Name
DateLines
2560.1250 notes behindAIMTEC::WICKS_Aon the Streets of San FranciscoMon Apr 26 1993 22:027
    Charly,
    
    Question 1: does it happen on an AMERICAN ENGLISH system?
    
    Regards,
    
    Andrew.D.Wicks
2560.2Welcome back, AndyVNABRW::EHRLICH_KThe Pit and the Pendulum!Wed Apr 28 1993 15:0612
    Dear Andrew,
    
    	as mentioned in .0 it is reproduceable with ALL-IN-1 V3.0-1 GERMAN
    Version here in our office, too.
    
    Well, what I think (regarding to 2528.*) is, that DDS ist not a RMS
    structured Database.
    
    Hhhhmmmm?
    
    Ciao
    Charly
2560.3What I was asking wasAIMTEC::WICKS_Aon the Streets of San FranciscoWed Apr 28 1993 17:5812
    Charly,
    
    DDS is nowhere like an RMS database it's a tree structure and wouldn't
    recognise the word RMS if it ran over it in the dark (:==:). I was just
    intrigued as to whether the display of the nice looking 'DCL overlay
    menu' happened on an untranslated ALL-IN-1 system to help determine
    whether the SPR went to Frankfurt or Reading.
    
    regards,
    
    Andrew.D.Wicks